[syzbot] [btrfs?] possible deadlock in btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode

4 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Jun 6, 2024, 4:14:28 AMJun 6
to c...@fb.com, dst...@suse.com, jo...@toxicpanda.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 2ab795141095 Merge tag 'cxl-fixes-6.10-rc3' of git://git.k..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=118fff2c980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=998c63c06e77f5e7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3dad89b3993a4b275e72
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: i386

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-2ab79514.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/31177e3311d1/vmlinux-2ab79514.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a9fa69e4242e/bzImage-2ab79514.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+3dad89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00010-g2ab795141095 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/111 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801eae4610 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x110/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1275

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8dd3a9a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xa88/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6924

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3783 [inline]
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3797
might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3890 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3980 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4019
btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
create_reloc_inode+0x403/0x820 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3911
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x471/0xe60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4114
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x143/0x450 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3373
__btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4157 [inline]
btrfs_balance+0x211a/0x3f00 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4534
btrfs_ioctl_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3675 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl+0x12ed/0x8290 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4742
__do_compat_sys_ioctl+0x2c3/0x330 fs/ioctl.c:1007
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

-> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315
start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0xaa/0x480 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1323
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x218/0xf60 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:2999
open_ctree+0x41ab/0x52e0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3554
btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:946 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1863 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0x11e9/0x1b90 fs/btrfs/super.c:2089
vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x380 fs/super.c:1780
fc_mount+0x16/0xc0 fs/namespace.c:1125
btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2052 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0xa53/0x1b90 fs/btrfs/super.c:2090
vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x380 fs/super.c:1780
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3352 [inline]
path_mount+0x6e1/0x1f10 fs/namespace.c:3679
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3875 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mount+0x295/0x320 fs/namespace.c:3875
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

-> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
join_transaction+0x148/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:314
start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0xaa/0x480 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1323
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x218/0xf60 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:2999
open_ctree+0x41ab/0x52e0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3554
btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:946 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1863 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0x11e9/0x1b90 fs/btrfs/super.c:2089
vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x380 fs/super.c:1780
fc_mount+0x16/0xc0 fs/namespace.c:1125
btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2052 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0xa53/0x1b90 fs/btrfs/super.c:2090
vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x380 fs/super.c:1780
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3352 [inline]
path_mount+0x6e1/0x1f10 fs/namespace.c:3679
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3692 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3898 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3875 [inline]
__ia32_sys_mount+0x295/0x320 fs/namespace.c:3875
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
__do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

-> #0 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1655 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1838 [inline]
start_transaction+0xbc1/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:694
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x110/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1275
btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
btrfs_scan_root fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:1118 [inline]
btrfs_free_extent_maps+0xbd3/0x1320 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:1189
super_cache_scan+0x409/0x550 fs/super.c:227
do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x18a/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
sb_internal#3 --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> fs_reclaim

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
lock(fs_reclaim);
rlock(sb_internal#3);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kswapd0/111:
#0: ffffffff8dd3a9a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0xa88/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6924
#1: ffff88801eae40e0 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
#1: ffff88801eae40e0 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x96/0x550 fs/super.c:196

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00010-g2ab795141095 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1655 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1838 [inline]
start_transaction+0xbc1/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:694
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x110/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1275
btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
btrfs_scan_root fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:1118 [inline]
btrfs_free_extent_maps+0xbd3/0x1320 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:1189
super_cache_scan+0x409/0x550 fs/super.c:227
do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
shrink_slab+0x18a/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:662
shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages