[syzbot] [jffs2?] possible deadlock in jffs2_read_folio

4 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Apr 17, 2024, 4:55:18 AM (13 days ago) Apr 17
to dw...@infradead.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linu...@lists.infradead.org, ric...@nod.at, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: b5d2afe8745b Merge branches 'for-next/kbuild', 'for-next/m..
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1321c40b180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=560f5db1d0b3f6d0
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7cab786a93f00e566e5b
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: arm64

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/50bff35e1638/disk-b5d2afe8.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4eeaa73e7ed1/vmlinux-b5d2afe8.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8e796b089aa9/Image-b5d2afe8.gz.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7cab78...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

jffs2: notice: (9998) jffs2_build_xattr_subsystem: complete building xattr subsystem, 1 of xdatum (0 unchecked, 0 orphan) and 2 of xref (0 dead, 0 orphan) found.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-gb5d2afe8745b #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/9998 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000efee8c18 (&f->sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jffs2_read_folio+0x6c/0xd0 fs/jffs2/file.c:125

but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000efee8f68 (mapping.invalidate_lock#11){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: filemap_invalidate_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline]
ffff0000efee8f68 (mapping.invalidate_lock#11){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: filemap_fault+0x6b4/0x1004 mm/filemap.c:3296

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (mapping.invalidate_lock#11){.+.+}-{3:3}:
down_read+0x58/0x2fc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
filemap_invalidate_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline]
filemap_fault+0x6b4/0x1004 mm/filemap.c:3296
__do_fault+0x11c/0x374 mm/memory.c:4531
do_read_fault mm/memory.c:4894 [inline]
do_fault mm/memory.c:5024 [inline]
do_pte_missing mm/memory.c:3880 [inline]
handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:5300 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0x36d0/0x5920 mm/memory.c:5441
handle_mm_fault+0x1e8/0x63c mm/memory.c:5606
__do_page_fault arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:505 [inline]
do_page_fault+0x550/0xaec arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:620
do_translation_fault+0xc4/0x114 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:704
do_mem_abort+0x74/0x200 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:840
el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:432
el1h_64_sync_handler+0x60/0xac arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:492
el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:593
__arch_copy_from_user+0xb8/0x230 arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S:110
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:890 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:890
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152
el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598

-> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
__might_fault+0xc4/0x124 mm/memory.c:6220
filldir64+0x2d4/0x948 fs/readdir.c:375
dir_emit include/linux/fs.h:3570 [inline]
jffs2_readdir+0x314/0x42c fs/jffs2/dir.c:152
iterate_dir+0x3f8/0x580 fs/readdir.c:110
__do_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:409 [inline]
__se_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:394 [inline]
__arm64_sys_getdents64+0x1c4/0x4a0 fs/readdir.c:394
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152
el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598

-> #0 (&f->sem){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x248/0x73c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:608
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:804
jffs2_read_folio+0x6c/0xd0 fs/jffs2/file.c:125
filemap_read_folio+0x14c/0x39c mm/filemap.c:2331
filemap_fault+0xab8/0x1004 mm/filemap.c:3381
__do_fault+0x11c/0x374 mm/memory.c:4531
do_read_fault mm/memory.c:4894 [inline]
do_fault mm/memory.c:5024 [inline]
do_pte_missing mm/memory.c:3880 [inline]
handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:5300 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0x36d0/0x5920 mm/memory.c:5441
handle_mm_fault+0x1e8/0x63c mm/memory.c:5606
__do_page_fault arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:505 [inline]
do_page_fault+0x550/0xaec arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:620
do_translation_fault+0xc4/0x114 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:704
do_mem_abort+0x74/0x200 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:840
el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:432
el1h_64_sync_handler+0x60/0xac arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:492
el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:593
__arch_copy_from_user+0xb8/0x230 arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S:110
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:890 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:890
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152
el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&f->sem --> &mm->mmap_lock --> mapping.invalidate_lock#11

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(mapping.invalidate_lock#11);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
lock(mapping.invalidate_lock#11);
lock(&f->sem);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.4/9998:
#0: ffff0000cd860190 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_lock include/linux/device.h:990 [inline]
#0: ffff0000cd860190 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: usbdev_do_ioctl drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2608 [inline]
#0: ffff0000cd860190 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: usbdev_ioctl+0x24c/0x66e0 drivers/usb/core/devio.c:2824
#1: ffff0000efee8f68 (mapping.invalidate_lock#11){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: filemap_invalidate_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline]
#1: ffff0000efee8f68 (mapping.invalidate_lock#11){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: filemap_fault+0x6b4/0x1004 mm/filemap.c:3296

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9998 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-gb5d2afe8745b #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:317
show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:324
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xe4/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:114
dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:123
print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2060
check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x248/0x73c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:608
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:804
jffs2_read_folio+0x6c/0xd0 fs/jffs2/file.c:125
filemap_read_folio+0x14c/0x39c mm/filemap.c:2331
filemap_fault+0xab8/0x1004 mm/filemap.c:3381
__do_fault+0x11c/0x374 mm/memory.c:4531
do_read_fault mm/memory.c:4894 [inline]
do_fault mm/memory.c:5024 [inline]
do_pte_missing mm/memory.c:3880 [inline]
handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:5300 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0x36d0/0x5920 mm/memory.c:5441
handle_mm_fault+0x1e8/0x63c mm/memory.c:5606
__do_page_fault arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:505 [inline]
do_page_fault+0x550/0xaec arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:620
do_translation_fault+0xc4/0x114 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:704
do_mem_abort+0x74/0x200 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:840
el1_abort+0x3c/0x5c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:432
el1h_64_sync_handler+0x60/0xac arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:492
el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:593
__arch_copy_from_user+0xb8/0x230 arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S:110
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:890 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:890
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152
el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages