[syzbot] possible deadlock in snd_mixer_oss_ioctl1

10 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Oct 23, 2021, 3:35:20 PM10/23/21
to alsa-...@alsa-project.org, bro...@kernel.org, j...@perches.com, la...@metafoo.de, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, pe...@perex.cz, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, ti...@suse.com, ti...@suse.de
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: cf6c9d12750c Add linux-next specific files for 20211022
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15d3d4c4b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e694204255ade3a3
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ace149a75a9a0a399ac7
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17c0530cb00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1129c952b00000

The issue was bisected to:

commit 411cef6adfb38a5bb6bd9af3941b28198e7fb680
Author: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
Date: Wed Oct 20 16:48:46 2021 +0000

ALSA: mixer: oss: Fix racy access to slots

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=167f6454b00000
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=157f6454b00000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=117f6454b00000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ace149...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 411cef6adfb3 ("ALSA: mixer: oss: Fix racy access to slots")

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.0-rc6-next-20211022-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor206/6529 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_set_volume sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:316 [inline]
ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_ioctl1+0x630/0x19a0 sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:375

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_set_volume sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:300 [inline]
ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_ioctl1+0x4b1/0x19a0 sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:375

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&mixer->reg_mutex);
lock(&mixer->reg_mutex);

*** DEADLOCK ***

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

1 lock held by syz-executor206/6529:
#0: ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_set_volume sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:300 [inline]
#0: ffff888021ff09c8 (&mixer->reg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_mixer_oss_ioctl1+0x4b1/0x19a0 sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:375

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 6529 Comm: syz-executor206 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6-next-20211022-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2956 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2999 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5637 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5602
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:607 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12f/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
snd_mixer_oss_set_volume sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:316 [inline]
snd_mixer_oss_ioctl1+0x630/0x19a0 sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:375
snd_mixer_oss_ioctl+0x40/0x50 sound/core/oss/mixer_oss.c:390
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f0c06979fe9
Code: 28 c3 e8 2a 14 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffea97dd558 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f0c06979fe9
RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 00000000c0044d00 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f0c0693dfd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f0c0693e060
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Pavel Skripkin

unread,
Oct 24, 2021, 10:07:45 AM10/24/21
to syzbot, alsa-...@alsa-project.org, bro...@kernel.org, j...@perches.com, la...@metafoo.de, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, pe...@perex.cz, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, ti...@suse.com, ti...@suse.de
Looks like typo in previous ALSA patch. [1] should fix it


[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/20211024140315.1...@gmail.com/T/#u




With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages