--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/bd276484-1f37-4d29-b9b4-2cfbbee3fb5c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
On 29/01/15 13:12, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> I'd say nsolve and lambdify should be able to do it. Especially for
> lambdify, I don't see the point of using mpmath if you aren't going to
> support arbitrary precision.
Yes nsolve definitely should work with arbitrary precision (#8564)
I was unsure about lambdify, I don't really understand precisely what it
is supposed to do. So thanks for your comment. Presumably speed is
important: perhaps it should do different things depending on whether
the inputs have more than 15 digits precision.
@moorepants in #8818 suggests some refactoring, but I'm not sure when
I'll get to any of this :( I worked around it in octsympy, by avoiding
nsolve (and lambdify), and working with mpmath.mp.findroot directly.
Colin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/54CAD450.2050802%40maths.ox.ac.uk.