On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Ondřej Čertík <
ondrej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Aaron Meurer <
asme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think evaluation is pretty straightforward. You just evaluate one
>> (like sin), and then the rest are easily defined in terms of it. I
>> like your approach.
>>
>> But what about the other things, like the series expansion or meijerg
>> table entries? And probably the biggest are the simplification rules
>
> I think the series expansion can be unified too, it looks quite similar.
>
>> (e.g., for the Fu algorithm). And can we somehow get basically all of
>> the hyperbolic functions automatically from
>>
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OsbornesRule.html?
>
> These two I don't know. We should look at some other software like
> Axiom, Maxima or Sage.
Or just prove whatever rule we use rigorously. Trig functions aren't
that complicated, it should be possible to do so.
>
>>
>> I wouldn't block on this, though. If you want to add a missing
>> function or functionality, you can just do it the duplicating way, and
>> we can figure out how to remove the duplication later. Just make sure
>> the tests verify the mathematical correctness of the functions.
>
> Hopefully I'll have some time over the summer to do this.
>
> Ondrej
Great. There are also some useful notes here
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/About-implementing-special-functions.
Aaron Meurer
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CADDwiVAUH-H8FmnHtdMWRsBVT7kmOM309Dea0Lpq3hGdE6fLQg%40mail.gmail.com.