Re: [sm-users] How can I use StructureMapServiceLocator with CommonServiceLocator?

[Ryan Heath]

Maybe you have already considered it, but why not use the internal container of .net core?

The switch should be verily easy.

// Ryan

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:41 PM Kerem <ke...@phonoclick.com> wrote:

I asked from stackoverflow, but I wanted to write it here as well.

We are migrating our project from .net framework to .net5. We have updated the structuremap package like other nuget packages. We couldn't use it with commonservicelocator in the new version.

Can it be used with CommonServiceLocator? Or should it be used in a different way?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67877484/how-can-i-use-structuremapservicelocator-with-commonservicelocator

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "structuremap-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to structuremap-us...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/ae2d36fb-9f6a-456b-9408-824655639482n%40googlegroups.com.

[pull rebase]

We are just migrating to .net core. now our project is .net framework.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/CABcSOXjTQH3aN%2BYnGwLKqkQLx3D8WT8A5nKbFn5QjBUACJXTmw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Jeremy Miller]

Or use Lamar so you don’t have to rewrite so much code, and not lose out on the considerable amount of functionality that Lamar/StructureMap has that the very minimalist built in container has.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/CABcSOXjTQH3aN%2BYnGwLKqkQLx3D8WT8A5nKbFn5QjBUACJXTmw%40mail.gmail.com.

[pull rebase]

@JeremyMiller   I will forward this to the team

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/3729F80F-7F0B-4FC1-A8B4-4AADAEB19310%40yahoo.com.

[Ryan Heath]

Very true! But the majority is using simple DI stuff, which the OOTB version can handle as good as well

// Ryan

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/3729F80F-7F0B-4FC1-A8B4-4AADAEB19310%40yahoo.com.

[Jeremy D Miller]

Uh huh, but the built in container doesn’t have Lamar’s diagnostics for when things aren’t simple

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 8, 2021, at 2:41 PM, Ryan Heath <ryan.q...@gmail.com> wrote:



To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/CABcSOXjyA%2Bzj%3D-%3DCaPAKGpeYRbOFuYdQ9JvRJmPgHRbzmLv4qw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Ryan Heath]

😀 We could go on for days, but for simple stuff (that most people do) 

the builtin diagnostics are (very) good enough.

// Ryan  

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/540B19F9-A4E6-4ED8-88FD-A82C7C5FCC64%40yahoo.com.

[pull rebase]

@ryan +1 :)

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/structuremap-users/CABcSOXhMTCjFS-gxQmwcmKVNWe0_4F_gRphZPiWCjWDe0Z8ddQ%40mail.gmail.com.