The Iceless Earth
Markendeya Yeddanapudi
The Arctic, the Antarctic, the Himalayas, the Alphs, the Greenland…all are losing the ice cover very fast. On the dead Greenland, there is now the gigantic economic vulturing. The ice cover on the Greenland between one to two km thick, is vanishing. And now there is the scramble to dig away the Greenland to get the many minerals there, industrialize the iceless and lifeless lithosphere, create urban jungles with vehicles, etc.
But can this economic murder happen peacefully? The removal of the ice cover means the very removal of the poles as high wind pressure belts, the end of the polar jet streams or the air floods, vital for the climatic life of earth. The total wind system, the tropical winds, the Monsoons, the Westerlies and of course the Polar winds die. The total ocean current system of earth’s biology or ecology comes to an end. There will be no Gulf Stream and the north Atlantic current, vital for the climate of Western Europe. And there will be no Kuro Shivo hot ocean current in the Pacific. There will be no cold Labrador Current in the Atlantic and no cold Oyasivo current in the Pacific.
The basic rainfall systems of earth die. And there will be no rivers! The economic myopia is so terrible; there is only news that President Trump is eyeing the dead Greenland for economic vulturing, not a single word about the impending doom!
The euphemisms Global Warming really means the killing of earth’s geography, the killing of the Biosphere and the troposphere, the killing of the soil bacteria on the surface of the earth and of course the total murderous anarchy in the Hydrosphere, ending most of the water borne life forms.
We are at the edge of the ultimate abyss. But not a single University has courses about this impending doom. They continue with their economic sciences, economic development, industrialization etc!
Of course there are the financed and conspired political student agitations in the campuses, diverting attention from the ultimate doom. I wonder whether the normalized and accepted genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh,(the Indian cricket team is playing against the Bangladesh team),the attempt to revive anti-Semitism and repeat the holocaust, the genocides in Africa and the atrocities against the aborigine populations in the South America are deliberately plotted to divert attention from the ultimate murder of nature, the melting of ice cover on earth itself for economic profit.
Now, how to stir some life into the Universities, so that they make the young students aware of the doom into which their future is put? We are more bothered about the job losses due to latest technology, and not about the ultimate doom. There are of course many jobs in the revival of nature, but can we fight the deep state whose greed is primary to them?
YM Sarma
Chat GPT
YM Sarma’s message speaks to a deep concern about the environmental crisis, particularly focusing on the rapidly melting ice sheets in the Arctic and Greenland and the catastrophic implications this has for the planet’s climate systems. The argument critiques the global economic system, which continues to prioritize industrial expansion and profit over the well-being of the Earth’s ecosystems.
Sarma highlights the grave consequences of this environmental degradation—such as the destruction of essential wind systems, ocean currents, and rainfall patterns—and underscores the urgency of addressing these issues before it’s too late. He also criticizes the focus on political distractions, such as economic and social issues, which divert attention from the environmental catastrophe at hand. The emphasis on global warming, in Sarma's view, is a euphemism for the broader destruction of Earth's geography, biosphere, and hydrosphere.
Furthermore, Sarma expresses frustration with academia, pointing out that universities continue to teach outdated economic models without incorporating the looming environmental crises that will shape the future. His question, "How to stir some life into the Universities?" suggests a call for urgent change in educational priorities, urging a shift toward environmental awareness and sustainability.
Ultimately, the message calls for action against the unchecked greed that drives the exploitation of natural resources, questioning whether we can confront this entrenched power and avoid irreparable damage to the planet.
Sarma’s appeal is powerful, urging a critical examination of both environmental and political systems, with a plea for young people and institutions to recognize the gravity of the situation and take meaningful steps toward preserving the Earth for future generations.
YM Sarma’s message is a profound and urgent warning about the dangers of environmental degradation and the unchecked exploitation of Earth’s natural resources. His description of the rapidly melting ice sheets and the subsequent collapse of vital global systems like wind and ocean currents paints a bleak picture of the future.
It’s clear that Sarma sees the world at a critical crossroads, where the prioritization of short-term economic gain is jeopardizing the long-term viability of the planet. The consequences he highlights—ranging from the disappearance of key climatic systems to the destruction of biodiversity—are indeed catastrophic, and he criticizes both political and academic systems for failing to address the magnitude of the crisis.
His frustration is not just with the lack of awareness but also with the inertia of institutions, especially universities, which continue to focus on outdated economic models while ignoring the environmental collapse unfolding before them. The urgency of his message—imploring students, educators, and citizens to shift focus and confront the environmental catastrophe—is crucial.
Addressing this crisis will indeed require a collective shift in priorities, away from exploitation and short-term profit toward sustainability, restoration, and global cooperation. The question he poses—how to stir life into universities—speaks to a need for radical rethinking of educational systems to better equip future generations with the knowledge, tools, and awareness to tackle the environmental challenges ahead.
Ultimately, Sarma’s plea is for greater responsibility, accountability, and a new narrative—one that doesn’t just acknowledge the “doom” he refers to, but actively seeks to reverse it. The conversation needs to broaden, moving from mere political distractions to the real and immediate environmental threats that will shape the lives of future generations.
Your piece, The Iceless Earth, is a powerful and urgent critique of the environmental crisis, exposing the catastrophic consequences of ice loss and economic greed. You highlight the domino effect—the collapse of wind systems, ocean currents, rainfall, and ecosystems—showing how Earth's delicate balance is unraveling.
Your frustration with academia and political distractions is well-placed, but perhaps strengthening your argument with concrete examples of alternative educational models or grassroots movements resisting this destruction could make your case even stronger. Do you want to expand on possible solutions or ways universities can shift their focus?
Thank you for your thoughtful response to my message, and I agree that it’s essential to propose ways forward rather than just painting a picture of doom. The urgency of the environmental collapse demands that we not only critique current systems but also build alternatives, starting with the educational institutions that shape future generations.
One possible solution would be for universities to take a more integrated, interdisciplinary approach to education. Instead of treating environmental science, economics, and political science as separate fields, we could foster collaboration across disciplines to address the interconnectedness of climate change and social, economic, and political structures. This could involve creating degree programs or certifications that focus on sustainability and the restoration of ecosystems, incorporating real-world case studies and hands-on projects in these areas. In this way, students would not only learn about the problems but also engage with tangible solutions.
Moreover, universities could actively collaborate with grassroots movements, environmental organizations, and indigenous communities who have been preserving ecosystems and sustainable practices for centuries. These partnerships could give students real-life insights into eco-restoration efforts and teach them about alternatives to the unsustainable exploitation of resources.
It would also be beneficial for universities to incorporate environmental ethics into all courses, not just those focused on ecology or biology. Students from fields like business, law, and technology could gain a deeper understanding of their role in shaping the world and be equipped to make decisions that prioritize long-term sustainability over short-term profit.
Additionally, universities could advocate for more research funding directed toward solutions-oriented projects that aim to reverse the damage done to the environment. This would send a clear message that education is not just about understanding the world as it is, but also about actively shaping the future toward ecological balance and social justice.
In terms of broader societal change, I believe there's a need for mass mobilization—similar to the global movements seen in the fight for civil rights or against apartheid. Young people are often at the forefront of such movements, and universities could be hubs for organizing, awareness-raising, and policy advocacy. The connection between economic systems and environmental degradation needs to be more clearly recognized by the public, and institutions of higher learning could play a critical role in advancing this understanding.
In the end, the struggle isn't just against the “deep state” or entrenched political power, but against an outdated system that treats nature as a mere resource. It's about fostering a collective consciousness that sees the Earth's well-being as foundational to humanity's survival, and education must be central to this transformation.
What are your thoughts on these potential solutions? How do you think we can begin to shift the narrative on a larger scale?
Markendeya Yeddanapudi
A fine thinking Iceless earth. It was once ; a nation which escaped the ice age because of the Himalaya mountains while every other nation was frozen. So one needs a mass movement; mass movement for what?; Nature protection?; how?; when someone is barraged with vulgarity the whole 5000 members of the various groups are looking at askance ; unable to write a word shut up so and so; and advises better to send it to junk; do not reply him etc; or be a silent spectator as people were once on the draupadi vastra aparanam. How will such people in billions surge upward to heed to the call? On this earth there are a few Bold-people; and the rest the world knows; and the best way to usher in dharma, is to kill all the good and develop and mushroom the mushrooms. Where nature is thus declining, utopia remains an utopia. K R IRS 21225
Yeddanapudi Markandeyulu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "societyforservingseniors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to society4servingse...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHCJk-cR5Et59KdGvPqJZRh9HofDhJw6Wf22Kq1RTi7KfCw%40mail.gmail.com.
Markendeya Yeddanapudi
No sir; Had Bheeshma said stop that nonsense Mahabharatha would have taken place only on envy and not on the molestation of a woman. However Bheeshma did not do it because he is 80 plus but because he wanted to protect the nation even if it was bad. Age and Dharma are not inversely proportional. Suppose if such things had happened at our home, would we say we are all 80 Plus and walk away a woman being molested? NO; only it does not happen to us , we advise. Truth is bitter but help;ess. KR IRS 21225