(k-+2^m)2^m+-1

17 views
Skip to first unread message

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
Sep 28, 2025, 8:03:50 AMSep 28
to seq...@googlegroups.com
Hello Everyone!  

If 3 | k, then 3 | (k-2^m)2^m+1 and 3 | (k+2^m)2^m-1. 

Let's define: odd numbers k > 1 indivisible by 3 such that 
both (k-2^m)2^m+1 and (k+2^m)2^m-1 are composite 
for every m > 0 with 2^m < k.  I'm asking for data. 
 
Are there any prime numbers among them? 
I do not think such primes exist; hmm...  
My conjecture: if p is an odd prime, 
then there is (at least one) prime 
of the form (p-+2^m)2^m+-1, 
where 1 < 2^m < p. 
Am I wrong? 
 
Best, 
 
Tom Ordo 

D. S. McNeil

unread,
Sep 28, 2025, 9:36:30 AMSep 28
to seq...@googlegroups.com
I think there are lots of such primes, unless I've made a typo:

In [29]: print(counters)
[6599, 9371, 12539, 13109, 25321, 34949, 39839, 40129, 46181, 48821, 49919, 59407, 69473, 69739, 70583, 78167, 87509, 88289, 89189]

For conjectures like this, it's not hard to learn enough coding to test them, and you don't even need to install anything locally these days with open interpreters and notebooks widely available.


Doug

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
Sep 28, 2025, 11:17:36 AMSep 28
to seq...@googlegroups.com
Doug, thanks! 

Yes, I checked your primes, they are correct.
Forgive me for taking up your precious time.

Until next time, 

Tom 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SeqFan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to seqfan+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/seqfan/CAOX9QiCU5YgmfRE-sVW3pouu7prB3eo1vL1WxjcUYYQK6gpNzQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
Sep 28, 2025, 2:01:53 PMSep 28
to SeqFan
PS. Here's something better for those interested. 

Let a(n) be the smallest odd k indivisible by 3 such that 
(k+2^m)2^m-1 are all composite for m <= n with m >= 1.  
Is the sequence (a) bounded? Namely a(n) = K for n >= N. 
If so, then (K+2^m)2^m-1 are all composite for every m >= 1. 

   Let b(n) be the smallest prime p > 3 such that 
(p+2^m)2^m-1 are all composite for m <= n with m >= 1.
Is the sequence (b) unbounded? It may be so!
   Since, by the dual Riesel conjecture, 
(p+2^m) is not a Riesel number. 
   It's better than nothing.

All right? 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages