a(1) = 1, ...

36 views
Skip to first unread message

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
May 30, 2026, 3:13:41 PM (4 days ago) May 30
to seq...@googlegroups.com
Hello Math Fans! 

Let a(n) be the largest m >= n such that 
prime((m+n)/2) = (prime(m)+prime(n))/2,
where m and n must have the same parity.
How far should we stop searching for such m? 
Without this knowledge there is no reliable data. 
However, someone can calculate something. 
Refutable conjecture: a(n) > n for n > 1.   

Best, 
Tom Ordo 

Allan Wechsler

unread,
May 30, 2026, 3:47:08 PM (4 days ago) May 30
to seq...@googlegroups.com
I'm not even convinced that it can be proven that there is such an m. It's true that the general slope of prime(n) increases, but it increases so slowly that the increase over a span of 2*k is not that much more than twice the increase over a span of k, so a slightly-unusually large value of prime((m+n)/2) offers an opportunity.

It might be worthwhile asking a similar question for an easier but similarly-growing function like floor(n ln n) ( oeis.com/A050504 ) or the closely related sum n/[1..n] ( oeis.com/A006218 ) .

-- Allan


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SeqFan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to seqfan+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/seqfan/CAF0qcNP%3DiTZcB_d-fr08-P2mwtoyr1Gr8OVY-tqL9uGztR3GCw%40mail.gmail.com.

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
May 31, 2026, 5:14:40 AM (4 days ago) May 31
to seq...@googlegroups.com
There is always m = n, which gives the trivial a(n) = n.
But my bold conjecture is that a(n) > n for every n > 1.
We have a(n) >= 1, 8, 7, 8, 15, 18, 13, ... Right? 
Maybe someone will find more and better data. 
Need an estimation of the type a(n) << n + f(n).
Could it be related to the k-tuple conjecture?
Just like this A289827 (with the pi function).
It is known that pi(2x) < 2 pi(x) for x >= 11.

Tomasz Ordowski

unread,
May 31, 2026, 1:41:02 PM (3 days ago) May 31
to seq...@googlegroups.com
PS. We considered arithmetic progressions of triples of primes with indices also in arithmetic progressions. 
I conjecture that every odd prime number initiates such a progression with a positive difference.
In general, there should be arbitrarily long arithmetic sequences of prime numbers with indices that also form arithmetic progressions.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages