--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hd%2BHYa23X8u%3DetJKCFzCZvR_rN8%3DTCAM%2BYj_0fWrExsbQ%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/7ce72d58-2d8f-4654-939d-42701944d88dn%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/4b888c16-6215-49eb-b84f-ef3a54a3c607n%40googlegroups.com.
Hmm, the ZMCV15 code uses an 8250 UART, but does bit-bang an SPI port for SDCard access (not the same thing). It does do some bit-banging using a spare bit on the 7-segment display, but that leverages the display refresh code and hardware. The altaid05 code looks to be half-duplex. I have my doubts, but best of luck.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/6a2bc767-bff6-4679-9d6e-dad0cd6157d6n%40googlegroups.com.
Seems to me that a very simple H8-like machine would be nice. Display and keypad to simulate the front panel, minimal RAM and ROM, no HDOS or CP/M support. The 8085 SID/SOD could be implemented as a download/upload channel, something like the cassette interface or to load/save Intel HEX format programs. An expansion bus then to add additional hardware in the future. Connecting the SID/SOD to a USB-Serial dongle (also supplying power) would then allow connecting to a PC for download/upload. I'm not sure how BHBasic would work over that serial connection, but with an expansion bus you could add a regular UART. Of course, the SID/SOD interface would never work with existing software that expects an 8250 UART.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/e43bde98-c5f7-4280-bc95-dc2afdd6783en%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hdDCRmODKGjYqNheY6%3DcHVnKSj_cMdjA9zj8P7QgPCkRQ%40mail.gmail.com.
It’s time to downsize. This system includes software manuals, H14, DC Hayes Modem, and more. Most impressively, it includes Norberto’s CF Memory board.
Complete Heathkit H8 Computer. Working, with Software and Peripherals & Modem | eBay
Eric Mack
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBDnssepjkPJBGdpN8Q%2BwkM2XjMR%3D%3D_7d0%3D6AWxX5K-2Aw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hcF0%2B2jJaZqweobHk8Vs-kj5DBpQvuebcx7tHc34A0%2BcA%40mail.gmail.com.
David Troendle and I did the work to recreate HDOS source in ASM form. It lives on bitbucket (David’s preferred repository):
https://bitbucket.org/HeathkitGuy/sebhcsoftware/src/master/HDOS/HDOS2.0/
I believe for what’s posted there we assembled the code and compared to the original ABS files and found either no differences or differences only in uninitialized storage.
We also did BH BASIC but I don’t see it posted on the site. Perhaps we never came full circle and completed that. I have a work in progress version on my computer. The files are dated June 2019 so it’s been a while!...
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hcF0%2B2jJaZqweobHk8Vs-kj5DBpQvuebcx7tHc34A0%2BcA%40mail.gmail.com.
If you do the bit bang on the speaker make it compatible with the mod that was popular back in the early days. Basically instead of gating the 1Hz tone the mod lets you gate the speaker directly. Of course this takes all of the cpu when you do it. The programs are on HUG volume 1
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 4:19 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
I thought of that. But I was thinking it might be more entertaining to have direct control of the speaker bit so you could bit-bang it to play chiptunes. :-)
Virus-free.www.avast.com |
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8he4peVBAHwYoWsBT2%3DGDgPEaODsGFoOr184UbZna%2BphiA%40mail.gmail.com.
Guys, now that my H8 system is sold and shipped, I have two floppy drives and a drawer full of new 5.25" and 3.5" floppies all DSHD. Any Interest? As for the drives, I have one Tandon TM-100-2A and One Toshiba MKM 0202A 001 drives.
Eric Mack
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/01f801dcdcf2%240f530e50%242df92af0%24%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/01e901dcdcf1%24b6400430%2422c00c90%24%40gmail.com.
So as I said, I do have the source for BH BASIC (110.06.00) – as distributed with HDOS 2, it may still have some typos from the OCR process but could presumably be repaired, but it makes extensive use of HDOS (SYSCALL) and not just for I/O. making it a ROMable or stand-alone version would be non trivial.
IMO more useful would be an earlier version from the “Tape OS” era. We have those in executable form and that may be enough? My understanding is the source was available for this way back when but I’m not aware of any accessible copy on any of our servers (though I recall someone here saying they had it).
I agree that running HDOS on this system would be a stretch. Stick to the early era of software…
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hfFeZPOSMpr1g5eK%3DU6yPqyO%3DO%2BJkpB2hzrN9aQpJtAQw%40mail.gmail.com.
> I do have the source for BH BASIC (110.06.00) – as distributed with HDOS 2... IMO more useful would be an earlier version from the “Tape OS” era.
Herb Johnson sent me a link to a PDF of this BASIC source. I looked, and agree that it would be a big problem to use it without HDOS. The earlier tape-based 4k BHBASIC should be easier to adapt, if the source can be found.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/047501dcdd98%240ff7d560%242fe78020%24%40gmail.com.
Oh, I see, eliminate the 27C256 entirely and replace it with a larger flash device. I see that the DIP32 versions of SST39SF020/SST39SF040 are discontinued (or soon will be), but I guess one can get a PLCC adapter and use PLCC32 ones.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/1149b5a2-2a53-48c1-a354-61717848f107n%40googlegroups.com.
PLCC are not surface mount, but their sockets do have pins in a denser arrangement. Not that bad to solder, IMHO. The 040 parts are possibly cheaper than 020. In keeping with most storage, the larger devices quickly become the normal and thus cheapest, and both have been around for some time now.The problem with bank selecting is that you need to provide some mapping where the code being executed at the time banks are switching does not get switched. And ORG0 introduces a new complexity to the mapping. At the very least, you probably want to use a GAL/CPLD for the memory mapping/address decoding, but not sure what size you'll need to support the mappings you need.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/d8e18a1a-590c-4fa4-94ed-f5520e272f1fn%40googlegroups.com.
Best of luck. I think some of those things are more complicated than they seem. If it were me, I'd focus on making the best platform for your original intent - a miniature bare-bones H8 with a way to be able to upload/download small programs from a PC (as if it were a cassette). I think HDOS, ORG0, and CP/M just unnecessarily complicate the whole thing. In my opinion.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/7cd92dcf-ce17-4897-8ac3-a20e4519ae54n%40googlegroups.com.
Lee,
Sorry to hear of your health problems and pray you are on the mend. I have been there, done that several times now too.
I have been mostly lurking on this thread since you started it. As a builder of many Heathkits, most still functioning here in my office/shop, I always wanted an H8, but never had the $$ at the time. So I am keenly interested in this project and will most likely buy from you when they are ready, assuming the plan is to make bare boards available to the community like many do over on the S100Computers group.
My question to you as I look over your schematic: What EDA software are you using? Is it KiCAD?
I really appreciate your logical layout of the schematic. It is very readable, well documented, and easy to follow unlike the schematics for some of the modern S-100 boards that have been created in the past 20 years where components are just plastered on the sheet with connections by netname only and little explanation of function. That method leaves one wondering how it works.
I posted a comment some time ago in regards to the serial I/O. I still think a real SIO chip would be welcome by many. I know you want to keep the first version very simple, but maybe just add a header with all the bus signals, so perhaps a daughter board could be added in the future to accommodate the SIO and other add-ons.
Thanks for what seems like a very worthwhile project!
Bob Bell
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hc_E4A7oZF-FgaVfeTiRV4WtS8sW_ACXFDxfAYu5YFH3w%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/06f885c2-6af9-4ba6-b875-8d894a089dd2%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBC0rgNcnK-G%2BPqcnyD3Bv%2B%3DaLyLBRczKRYt3-hLsyb%2B8A%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hdfhk-Ls8AnMManWNEG1eCMHK%2BHKzGbrU6KBPTxLmQbrg%40mail.gmail.com.
...
Joe, I've started looking at the XCON8 source, and I agree it needs to be extensively rewritten. But I still don't know what entry points in it should be kept the same for external programs. I guess time will tell.
...
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBCv-HmdT0MPri_zkKnD-h%2BAW9n6d%2BehBkY9Mi6OFq%3DS4g%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CACkv5mCcfPhfKmGXcYPJBKeEXp-gBuXVZS%2Bber2By9%2BCaKrNDw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hexPse4PaBiK9yxs1VSwGPMhne0%2BjDTGORDe0QBMK5Jjw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAGQDgBBpW%3D3KUqG2hdjwYdo1TwgAN4L8MTMZAKkhZdJhYROabw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB7918FB72AAE93B44AF162BCDF7F12%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hexPse4PaBiK9yxs1VSwGPMhne0%2BjDTGORDe0QBMK5Jjw%40mail.gmail.com.
On the 82C55 you want to use OKI "MSM82C55A-2” as it can operate at 3V.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB79188C332658A305EF08E9B4F7FF2%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB7918D30912F7BCE725A1719AF7F92%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hfJLSTqSWgcJA%3DpGjt2S_GyHXywUDmCfSOvwJGSC9Atqg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/03e96bfa-aa62-4b00-ab47-2d237a3302b9n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB79189A95ECFCA0B8537956C9F7C42%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
Hi again Lee
Regarding “(especially once we get HDOS or CP/M going)”, I hope that having the H8 BASIC is still something that is planned. I imagine that being able to play with the computer in BASIC will be more immediate and accessible than anything in C/PM. I suppose it comes down to what the most likely use of a “badge” computer would be.....fairly brief playing and demonstrations, or getting real work done......
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2026 6:22 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
I'm guessing it will indeed have a relatively short battery life. LED segment current is designed for about 3ma. If half the segments are lit, that's about 30 segments or 100mA. The rest of the circuit draws 29mA at 5v, so the total load is about 130mA. AAA cells are good for around 500mAH, which is around a 4-hour battery life.
But I imagine most people will mostly use it with a USB adapter supplying 5v power (especially once we get HDOS or CP/M going).
Virus-free.www.avast.com |
On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 5:04 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Board looking great. Do you think the display will drain the battery very fast?
Get Outlook for iOS
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, 19 July 2026 14:05:44
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
You're right; the center cell does need support. I have a plastic battery tube salvaged from something. But the plan is to suggest wrapping the cells with a strip of paper glued or taped to form a tube. Here's a photo of the board with the batteries and 0.6" ICs installed.
Now the fun begins.😀 My first test will be a program that just echoes the SID input to the SOD output to confirm that it works.
I made up some parts kits, and will be sending them out on Monday to people that requested one to help with development.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 8:55 PM 'Randy E (OoMOR)' via SEBHC <se...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Lee,
That looks really nice. Thank you for doing this.
Randy
On Saturday, July 18, 2026 at 5:57:08 PM UTC-7 Joe Travis N6YPC wrote:
'Looks awesome Lee!
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 7:54 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Norberto. :-) Here is a "baby" photo of the first assembled PCB. I left out the 0.6" chips so you can see the parts underneath. The white connector is for a CH340 USB-serial adapter. There is also a place for a Sparkfun FTDI USB-serial adapter (they have different pinouts).
There is no software (yet). I'd be glad to send one to anyone who would like to help write it. My plan is to start with Heath's PAM8 and modify it for the I/O changes.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 5:49 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Great work!👍
Get Outlook for iOS
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2026 10:38:49
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
Progress report: I got my mini H8 PCBs last friday, and have been building up the first one. Testing as I go. So far, so good. I'm using socket pins for the 0.3" wide ICs that hide under the 0.6" ones, so everything is socketed for troubleshooting. Will post photos when I finish getting it built. :-)
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 3:01 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Norberto> On the 82C55 you want to use OKI "MSM82C55A-2” as it can operate at 3V.
Good point. The OKI 82C55 is the only one whose datasheet explicitly says it works at 3v. The parts I have are Intersil, but work down to at least 3.5v. I have OKI MSM80C85A CPUs, which are also spec'd to work at 3v.
I didn't think of including a 3v-to-5v switching regulator. (I'm too olde-skool I guess.) It would allow use with a single 3.7v lithium cell.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 2:54 AM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Thanks Lee! The only small boards, I have done are the "RCBus-80pin” to run the H89 monitor on it.
I think to keep the battery supplying VCC, it will be nice to add the 5V Step-Up Voltage Regulator U3V9F5 which will provide VCC with a battery input of 2.6v. The user could run longer the CPU with such regulator.
On the 82C55 you want to use OKI "MSM82C55A-2” as it can operate at 3V.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8heqLAVrWKYah5McfHodOAC6j4tuoyHX-nQuLW0c4e4Phg%40mail.gmail.com.
We may be able to do some clever tricks to automatically dim or disable LED update
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Douglas Miller
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2026 7:50 PM
To: SEBHC <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The LED display is multiplexed, right? So battery life will be better than calculated for segments lit continuously.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/ffdb2931-af46-418d-b892-46ffd0c19823n%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/bd386d2d-2f5f-4cec-b6c6-a1a6eba449e5n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB79183FE6E808F1D76A4CC459F7C22%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
...
Hi Lee
I did a little bit of planning work on the H* keycaps. Had quite a headache for most of the last few days, so did not feel much like doing anything, but better today.
I have a few questions and observations on the subject of the keypad labels.
I hope to finish the 3D design and print the first experimental samples tomorrow.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:37 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The keys on the mini H8 are on 0.4" centers. Paul Schmidt is working on some 3D printed keycaps for it. I seem to recall that someone made replacement keycap stickers for the H8. They would be 0.4" square and could be used for the mini H8. Does anyone remember who made them?
Virus-free.www.avast.com |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Douglas, I think you're right. I forgot that the multiplexing will lower the total LED current, so it won't be as bad as my off-the-cuff estimate.
The high-state output resistance of the 82C55 is about 100 ohms. The LEDs have about a 1.8v forward drop. The 74LS145 has about a 0.5v drop. So the LED current is about 5v-1.8v-0.5v, so 2.7v / 100 ohms = 2.7ma. But only one digit is "on" at a time. Half the segments would be 2.7ma x 4 = 11ma.
When spread across 9 digits, I'm wondering if I may have a problem with not enough brightness.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:30 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Done.
Thanks Lee!
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2026 at 6:51 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMWNorberto (and Glenn): I'd be glad to send you a PCB, but I'm not sure I have your current address. Can you send it to me at <leea...@earthlink.net>?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 8:57 PM Douglas Miller <durga...@gmail.com> wrote:
My point being, if each segment draws 3mA and there are 30 segments lit across 9 digits, and each digit is on 11% of the time, then that would be about 10mA total for the display. Unless I've missed something critical.
On Sunday, July 19, 2026 at 6:50:01 PM UTC-5 Douglas Miller wrote:
The LED display is multiplexed, right? So battery life will be better than calculated for segments lit continuously.
On Sunday, July 19, 2026 at 6:22:38 PM UTC-5 Lee wrote:
I'm guessing it will indeed have a relatively short battery life. LED segment current is designed for about 3ma. If half the segments are lit, that's about 30 segments or 100mA. The rest of the circuit draws 29mA at 5v, so the total load is about 130mA. AAA cells are good for around 500mAH, which is around a 4-hour battery life.
But I imagine most people will mostly use it with a USB adapter supplying 5v power (especially once we get HDOS or CP/M going).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/bd386d2d-2f5f-4cec-b6c6-a1a6eba449e5n%40googlegroups.com.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8he%2BT_YBqR2wSV9iBZJZF-jDvVvu2FKomEpLFZ6647GJeQ%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/SA3PR01MB79183FE6E808F1D76A4CC459F7C22%40SA3PR01MB7918.prod.exchangelabs.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hd0v732m%3DFLFG_nZkPnt9XvDNdFiQsTE-u0fAguxPSg9A%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Lee
I did a little bit of planning work on the H* keycaps. Had quite a headache for most of the last few days, so did not feel much like doing anything, but better today.
I have a few questions and observations on the subject of the keypad labels.
- I pulled out my H8 from storage, and indeed the labels measure somewhere between 0.4” and 0.41”; I suspect that the recessed keytops are actually right at 0.4”, as you said, and that the larger dimension is measurement error,
- That said, the keytops that I am designing will be smaller than 0.4” square. If they were exactly 0.4”, none of the keys would push, due to friction with other keys on 0.4” centers. So, any repro key labels that might turn up from somebody will require at least some trimming to fit the new 3D printed key caps, so no extra hardship for me to design my own laser-printable key cap label artwork, which would also need to be cut out. People making the kit, if they want to use key caps, could go either way on which labels to use.....EXCEPT some artwork on 0.4” square labels might be too close to the edges and thus might end up being cut off during trimming.
- I compared the PCB silkscreen legends with the label artwork on my H8. Some disparities I need your help with:
- S7 label says “SI” while the silkscreen says “STEP”.....the latter will fit, but I wonder if your version might do something else as noted by “SI”....?
- SP label says “REG”, but the silkscreen is blank in this regard......is this function not likely to make sense/be implemented?
- SM (?) label says “MEM” at the upper left and “RTM/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “MEM”......?
- SR label says “ALTER” at the upper left and “RST/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “ALTER”......?
- I am doing some experiments with different adhesives for the labels. I usually use Scotch Extra Strength adhesive roller/tape runner, which is truly strong and permanent. I am also trying Scotch Permanent Glue Stick, and CA glue. The glue stick has the advantage of being briefly repositionable during the first few seconds, but it is intended for paper and does not grip plastics nearly as well.
I hope to finish the 3D design and print the first experimental samples tomorrow.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:37 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The keys on the mini H8 are on 0.4" centers. Paul Schmidt is working on some 3D printed keycaps for it. I seem to recall that someone made replacement keycap stickers for the H8. They would be 0.4" square and could be used for the mini H8. Does anyone remember who made them?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Douglas, I think you're right. I forgot that the multiplexing will lower the total LED current, so it won't be as bad as my off-the-cuff estimate.
The high-state output resistance of the 82C55 is about 100 ohms. The LEDs have about a 1.8v forward drop. The 74LS145 has about a 0.5v drop. So the LED current is about 5v-1.8v-0.5v, so 2.7v / 100 ohms = 2.7ma. But only one digit is "on" at a time. Half the segments would be 2.7ma x 4 = 11ma.
When spread across 9 digits, I'm wondering if I may have a problem with not enough brightness.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:30 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Done.
Thanks Lee!
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2026 at 6:51 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMWNorberto (and Glenn): I'd be glad to send you a PCB, but I'm not sure I have your current address. Can you send it to me at <leea...@earthlink.net>?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/00d401dd1990%248e102270%24aa306750%24%40earthlink.net.
I did realize/remember something regarding the display recently. The H8 Front Panel (which includes the 2mS clock) generates a "clear" on the segment refresh register at the end of the 2mS cycle, which effectively blanks the current digit at that time. This means that the software must update the digit/segment select registers "immediately" after the 2mS Clock interrupt signal, after which that digit will be displayed for about 1.5 mS. I think the main reason for this is so if (when) the software crashes - or interrupts get stuck disabled - that the display will go blank. Otherwise, the most-recently refreshed digit will be stuck on. I don't think there's any practical solution here for this hardware, but it's just some behavior to be aware of.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/12bcd120-5c1f-4738-ac0c-8ee89b52b972n%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/ffdb9ada-4f3e-4a17-b194-8d054f4425ccn%40googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/8ccf904d-a4b0-4b30-bc77-42ffb269d8a7n%40googlegroups.com.
The P-Touch label design software, common to at least most of the Brother P-Touch label printers, don’t let you mix different fonts or font sizes in the same “text frame” within a label design. But the software DOES allow having more than one text frame within a label, and each frame can have its own font & font size. But doing that, one soon runs into issues with overlapping frames, unintended cropping, the less than precise and always irritating limitations with margins within a text frame, and the software’s tendency to spontaneously override your desires when it thinks some boundary, etc; has been violated. I have found the whole P-Touch product to be of immense help on so many projects, but for little/precise things like the H8 keycap labels, I have found that approach to be inadequate.
That is why I did not go that way with my efforts regarding the H8 Mini. Instead, I am using the free design software from Front Panel Express, which lets you do almost anything you want, and with great precision. But it requires LOTS of calculations to figure all the coordinates (it SUCKS at drag & drop positioning).
I have attached an image of where I am currently on the layout design. I have populated “placeholder” text at the three main positions in the first row of labels; this is just to allow me to adjust for closest appearance to my original H8 keypad. The software does not allow me to precisely mimic the original Heathkit font (but I think I have come pretty close).
Anyone wanting to use these will be able to get a PDF, which when printed on a laser printer (B&W or color) at 100% scaling should result in a very accurately sized set of labels. They are separated by bold white lines, making it easy to accurately cut them apart with a paper shear or pair of scissors, resulting in 9.5x9.5mm labels, just a hair smaller than the faces of my 3D printable keycaps.
They can be printed on paper, or on adhesive label sheets, etc. For my OWN H8 Mini, I will be printing to either 3M “Print To Last” paper or Xerox “Revolution Never Tear” paper; the two products are identical (I think 3M sold the product to Xerox a few years ago). This is a porous plastic ‘paper’ that is intended for making durable documents and labels using a laser printer (any xerographic printer/copier). The toner fuses into the surface structure and it will not come off, ideal for key labels. The material is impervious to liquids, sweat, oils, etc; and is dimensionally stable. The only downside is that it is not available with adhesive backing, so the user needs to apply the adhesive of their choice to either the keycap or the label and stick them together. I personally like the Scotch Extra Strength (permanent) “Tape Runner” for small labels, but many other adhesives will work well, including CA glue applied sparingly. One thing I can verify will NOT work is the Scotch Permanent Glue Stick product (it only works well on actual paper).
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2026 1:59 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
Thanks Darrell. Paul has printed some keycaps to fit the mini H8. They are 10mm square with a flat top, so H8-size labels would probably work!
I have a Brother PT-D200. I experimented, and it won't let me mix font sizes on a label. The number and text had to be the same size, i.e. pretty small. Is your PT-610BD able to do that? Or did you have to make two labels, one with a big number and a second with smaller text?
Hi Paul,
For what it's worth, Glenn and I used a Brother P-Touch PT-D610BT Label Maker to make labels. I 3D printed a jig to cut them with an Exatco knife. The jig is shown in my H8 video at 12:39. I also printed key caps for Terry Smedley's keyboard. Let me know if you want any more info.
Darrell
On Wednesday, July 22, 2026 at 12:14:15 AM UTC-4 Paul Schmidt wrote:
Hi Lee
I did a little bit of planning work on the H* keycaps. Had quite a headache for most of the last few days, so did not feel much like doing anything, but better today.
I have a few questions and observations on the subject of the keypad labels.
- I pulled out my H8 from storage, and indeed the labels measure somewhere between 0.4” and 0.41”; I suspect that the recessed keytops are actually right at 0.4”, as you said, and that the larger dimension is measurement error,
- That said, the keytops that I am designing will be smaller than 0.4” square. If they were exactly 0.4”, none of the keys would push, due to friction with other keys on 0.4” centers. So, any repro key labels that might turn up from somebody will require at least some trimming to fit the new 3D printed key caps, so no extra hardship for me to design my own laser-printable key cap label artwork, which would also need to be cut out. People making the kit, if they want to use key caps, could go either way on which labels to use.....EXCEPT some artwork on 0.4” square labels might be too close to the edges and thus might end up being cut off during trimming.
- I compared the PCB silkscreen legends with the label artwork on my H8. Some disparities I need your help with:
- S7 label says “SI” while the silkscreen says “STEP”.....the latter will fit, but I wonder if your version might do something else as noted by “SI”....?
- SP label says “REG”, but the silkscreen is blank in this regard......is this function not likely to make sense/be implemented?
- SM (?) label says “MEM” at the upper left and “RTM/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “MEM”......?
- SR label says “ALTER” at the upper left and “RST/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “ALTER”......?
- I am doing some experiments with different adhesives for the labels. I usually use Scotch Extra Strength adhesive roller/tape runner, which is truly strong and permanent. I am also trying Scotch Permanent Glue Stick, and CA glue. The glue stick has the advantage of being briefly repositionable during the first few seconds, but it is intended for paper and does not grip plastics nearly as well.
I hope to finish the 3D design and print the first experimental samples tomorrow.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:37 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The keys on the mini H8 are on 0.4" centers. Paul Schmidt is working on some 3D printed keycaps for it. I seem to recall that someone made replacement keycap stickers for the H8. They would be 0.4" square and could be used for the mini H8. Does anyone remember who made them?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Douglas, I think you're right. I forgot that the multiplexing will lower the total LED current, so it won't be as bad as my off-the-cuff estimate.
The high-state output resistance of the 82C55 is about 100 ohms. The LEDs have about a 1.8v forward drop. The 74LS145 has about a 0.5v drop. So the LED current is about 5v-1.8v-0.5v, so 2.7v / 100 ohms = 2.7ma. But only one digit is "on" at a time. Half the segments would be 2.7ma x 4 = 11ma.
When spread across 9 digits, I'm wondering if I may have a problem with not enough brightness.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:30 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Done.
Thanks Lee!
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2026 at 6:51 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMWNorberto (and Glenn): I'd be glad to send you a PCB, but I'm not sure I have your current address. Can you send it to me at <leea...@earthlink.net>?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hewmzf7_E1DK__eN67Cbwp4bHg%3D4iGi%2BYvjGka4sCgYXw%40mail.gmail.com.
I have laid some of my new 3D printed H8 Mini keycaps face-down on the keypad labels on my old H8. With some VERY careful and tight trimming, it would just barely be possible to get the full-size labels to fit the new keycaps without actually losing any text.
I have attached the latest version (JPEG) of my own keycap label design, dimensioned optimally for the 10mm square faces of my new keycaps. I made the secondary text yellow, which I think looks better. But if printed as B&W, all text will appear white, so no separate B&W version is necessary. To those readers who saw my first version earlier yesterday, the only change here is that I increased the size of the secondary text slightly, which helps with clarity where certain letter combinations are closely adjacent.
Note that my design has the 16 labels in a 4x4 array, just like the keypad, and separated by 2mm-wide white lines. This will make it easier (than with tinner lines) to cut them apart. I recommend printing onto Xerox “Revolution Never Tear” laser-printable plastic paper. Choice of adhesive will be up to folks who choose to use my keycaps on their H8 Mini’s.
Once I get Lee Hart’s approval, I plan to put my 3D printer file, the PDF of these labels, etc; up on my fileshare webpage, and will make that URL known here.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2026 1:59 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
Thanks Darrell. Paul has printed some keycaps to fit the mini H8. They are 10mm square with a flat top, so H8-size labels would probably work!
I have a Brother PT-D200. I experimented, and it won't let me mix font sizes on a label. The number and text had to be the same size, i.e. pretty small. Is your PT-610BD able to do that? Or did you have to make two labels, one with a big number and a second with smaller text?
Hi Paul,
For what it's worth, Glenn and I used a Brother P-Touch PT-D610BT Label Maker to make labels. I 3D printed a jig to cut them with an Exatco knife. The jig is shown in my H8 video at 12:39. I also printed key caps for Terry Smedley's keyboard. Let me know if you want any more info.
Darrell
On Wednesday, July 22, 2026 at 12:14:15 AM UTC-4 Paul Schmidt wrote:
Hi Lee
I did a little bit of planning work on the H* keycaps. Had quite a headache for most of the last few days, so did not feel much like doing anything, but better today.
I have a few questions and observations on the subject of the keypad labels.
- I pulled out my H8 from storage, and indeed the labels measure somewhere between 0.4” and 0.41”; I suspect that the recessed keytops are actually right at 0.4”, as you said, and that the larger dimension is measurement error,
- That said, the keytops that I am designing will be smaller than 0.4” square. If they were exactly 0.4”, none of the keys would push, due to friction with other keys on 0.4” centers. So, any repro key labels that might turn up from somebody will require at least some trimming to fit the new 3D printed key caps, so no extra hardship for me to design my own laser-printable key cap label artwork, which would also need to be cut out. People making the kit, if they want to use key caps, could go either way on which labels to use.....EXCEPT some artwork on 0.4” square labels might be too close to the edges and thus might end up being cut off during trimming.
- I compared the PCB silkscreen legends with the label artwork on my H8. Some disparities I need your help with:
- S7 label says “SI” while the silkscreen says “STEP”.....the latter will fit, but I wonder if your version might do something else as noted by “SI”....?
- SP label says “REG”, but the silkscreen is blank in this regard......is this function not likely to make sense/be implemented?
- SM (?) label says “MEM” at the upper left and “RTM/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “MEM”......?
- SR label says “ALTER” at the upper left and “RST/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “ALTER”......?
- I am doing some experiments with different adhesives for the labels. I usually use Scotch Extra Strength adhesive roller/tape runner, which is truly strong and permanent. I am also trying Scotch Permanent Glue Stick, and CA glue. The glue stick has the advantage of being briefly repositionable during the first few seconds, but it is intended for paper and does not grip plastics nearly as well.
I hope to finish the 3D design and print the first experimental samples tomorrow.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:37 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The keys on the mini H8 are on 0.4" centers. Paul Schmidt is working on some 3D printed keycaps for it. I seem to recall that someone made replacement keycap stickers for the H8. They would be 0.4" square and could be used for the mini H8. Does anyone remember who made them?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Douglas, I think you're right. I forgot that the multiplexing will lower the total LED current, so it won't be as bad as my off-the-cuff estimate.
The high-state output resistance of the 82C55 is about 100 ohms. The LEDs have about a 1.8v forward drop. The 74LS145 has about a 0.5v drop. So the LED current is about 5v-1.8v-0.5v, so 2.7v / 100 ohms = 2.7ma. But only one digit is "on" at a time. Half the segments would be 2.7ma x 4 = 11ma.
When spread across 9 digits, I'm wondering if I may have a problem with not enough brightness.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:30 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Done.
Thanks Lee!
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2026 at 6:51 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMWNorberto (and Glenn): I'd be glad to send you a PCB, but I'm not sure I have your current address. Can you send it to me at <leea...@earthlink.net>?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hewmzf7_E1DK__eN67Cbwp4bHg%3D4iGi%2BYvjGka4sCgYXw%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "SEBHC" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sebhc/qgdS6eQElIo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to sebhc+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAF__8hewmzf7_E1DK__eN67Cbwp4bHg%3D4iGi%2BYvjGka4sCgYXw%40mail.gmail.com.
Darrell, that is a good point. Even though I use the Brother P-Touch stuff a LOT, I had forgotten about its ability to print graphics is using the PC software. It is still low-res, but it allows layouts that might not be possible in the software’s normal “text” mode. One can for example design the desired label in other software, save it as graphics file, and import it into the P-Touch software for printing.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Darrell Pelan
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2026 6:51 AM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
Yes, the labels were a single print. When you use the label printer with your PC there is a lot of flexibility, including graphics.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 2:59 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Darrell. Paul has printed some keycaps to fit the mini H8. They are 10mm square with a flat top, so H8-size labels would probably work!
I have a Brother PT-D200. I experimented, and it won't let me mix font sizes on a label. The number and text had to be the same size, i.e. pretty small. Is your PT-610BD able to do that? Or did you have to make two labels, one with a big number and a second with smaller text?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 8:45 AM Darrell Pelan <pel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paul,
For what it's worth, Glenn and I used a Brother P-Touch PT-D610BT Label Maker to make labels. I 3D printed a jig to cut them with an Exatco knife. The jig is shown in my H8 video at 12:39. I also printed key caps for Terry Smedley's keyboard. Let me know if you want any more info.
Darrell
On Wednesday, July 22, 2026 at 12:14:15 AM UTC-4 Paul Schmidt wrote:
Hi Lee
I did a little bit of planning work on the H* keycaps. Had quite a headache for most of the last few days, so did not feel much like doing anything, but better today.
I have a few questions and observations on the subject of the keypad labels.
- I pulled out my H8 from storage, and indeed the labels measure somewhere between 0.4” and 0.41”; I suspect that the recessed keytops are actually right at 0.4”, as you said, and that the larger dimension is measurement error,
- That said, the keytops that I am designing will be smaller than 0.4” square. If they were exactly 0.4”, none of the keys would push, due to friction with other keys on 0.4” centers. So, any repro key labels that might turn up from somebody will require at least some trimming to fit the new 3D printed key caps, so no extra hardship for me to design my own laser-printable key cap label artwork, which would also need to be cut out. People making the kit, if they want to use key caps, could go either way on which labels to use.....EXCEPT some artwork on 0.4” square labels might be too close to the edges and thus might end up being cut off during trimming.
- I compared the PCB silkscreen legends with the label artwork on my H8. Some disparities I need your help with:
- S7 label says “SI” while the silkscreen says “STEP”.....the latter will fit, but I wonder if your version might do something else as noted by “SI”....?
- SP label says “REG”, but the silkscreen is blank in this regard......is this function not likely to make sense/be implemented?
- SM (?) label says “MEM” at the upper left and “RTM/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “MEM”......?
- SR label says “ALTER” at the upper left and “RST/0” at the lower right, but the silkscreen says only “ALTER”......?
- I am doing some experiments with different adhesives for the labels. I usually use Scotch Extra Strength adhesive roller/tape runner, which is truly strong and permanent. I am also trying Scotch Permanent Glue Stick, and CA glue. The glue stick has the advantage of being briefly repositionable during the first few seconds, but it is intended for paper and does not grip plastics nearly as well.
I hope to finish the 3D design and print the first experimental samples tomorrow.
Paul
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Lee Hart
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 4:37 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMW
The keys on the mini H8 are on 0.4" centers. Paul Schmidt is working on some 3D printed keycaps for it. I seem to recall that someone made replacement keycap stickers for the H8. They would be 0.4" square and could be used for the mini H8. Does anyone remember who made them?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 3:48 PM Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Douglas, I think you're right. I forgot that the multiplexing will lower the total LED current, so it won't be as bad as my off-the-cuff estimate.
The high-state output resistance of the 82C55 is about 100 ohms. The LEDs have about a 1.8v forward drop. The 74LS145 has about a 0.5v drop. So the LED current is about 5v-1.8v-0.5v, so 2.7v / 100 ohms = 2.7ma. But only one digit is "on" at a time. Half the segments would be 2.7ma x 4 = 11ma.
When spread across 9 digits, I'm wondering if I may have a problem with not enough brightness.
Virus-free.www.avast.com
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:30 PM norberto.collado koyado.com <norberto...@koyado.com> wrote:
Done.
Thanks Lee!
From: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Lee Hart <electr...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 20, 2026 at 6:51 PM
To: se...@googlegroups.com <se...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [sebhc] Re: An H8 Badge for VCFMWNorberto (and Glenn): I'd be glad to send you a PCB, but I'm not sure I have your current address. Can you send it to me at <leea...@earthlink.net>?
Virus-free.www.avast.com
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sebhc/CAKhgrKs%2BuNmEgcEvzs3ft1EfyVbcOaEQnoSRzcCaQaYcDp01Yw%40mail.gmail.com.