--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scheme-reports-wg2/CAD2gp_SbEPFtBYPj08mzNH2g7ATeyn4P1xLHcM92UKLiW3aS4Q%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg1" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scheme-reports-wg1/CAMMPzYNy152xm92J5n%3DGnVzzZ%3D0dh5kjJ-gKUcpTKbO_uizjmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
John Cowan <co...@ccil.org> writes:
> As written, the list of valid characters in identifiers suggests that all
> the characters in the Lu , Ll, ... Co characters are allowed. However,
> this is only true of characters outside the ASCII repertoire, as R6RS
> specifies explicitly. Thus although ';' is a Po character, and Po is one
> of the allowed categories, that does not mean that ';' is allowed in
> identifiers.
Does this mean that this wouldn’t be legal code?
(define |foo;| 'foo)
(write |foo;|)
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scheme-reports-wg2/CAD2gp_SSepmCEkH0J2LiyRXf%2BDfeVzocF0Jiaeqoh7d%3DWskY5A%40mail.gmail.com.