--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/6f7baf79-4540-48f4-94f7-f830f87d1d8bn%40googlegroups.com.
This is an interesting video for me since the camera positioner that he is using looks like the QuickSet positioner that I have. If it is, the position sensors are potentiometers. My guess is that the accuracy is around 1 percent, which for azimuth is 3.6 degrees. For elevation it would be 1.8 degrees. I was figuring that to be useful for radio astronomy, the positioning system would have to be calibrated over its range. The fact that he has a rather large antenna being driven by the camera positioner is encouraging, since I had thought that a large antenna would have to be carefully counter balanced if driven by the camera positioner. The positioner that I have is supposed to be able to take a load of 90 pounds, but I don't usually run it at its rated voltage of 115 VDC.
I have often wondered how useful my camera positioner would be for pointing antennas. Gabe's video has demonstrated that it could be very useful.
This is an interesting video for me since the camera positioner that he is using looks like the QuickSet positioner that I have. If it is, the position sensors are potentiometers. My guess is that the accuracy is around 1 percent, which for azimuth is 3.6 degrees. For elevation it would be 1.8 degrees. I was figuring that to be useful for radio astronomy, the positioning system would have to be calibrated over its range. The fact that he has a rather large antenna being driven by the camera positioner is encouraging, since I had thought that a large antenna would have to be carefully counter balanced if driven by the camera positioner. The positioner that I have is supposed to be able to take a load of 90 pounds, but I don't usually run it at its rated voltage of 115 VDC.
I have often wondered how useful my camera positioner would be for pointing antennas. Gabe's video has demonstrated that it could be very useful.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/f0516459-92cd-4ba9-892c-c04c0f876ba2%40ameritech.net.