Sage 10.2.beta9 released

[Volker Braun]

As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html

I'm proposing 10.2.rc0 next, so if there is anything that you want to be merged before then now would be a good time to do so ;)

eb8417b6107 (github/develop, tag: 10.2.beta9) Updated SageMath version to 10.2.beta9
c0221f90a86 gh-36554: Speedup of the method to reduce ternary quadratic forms in the class TernaryQF
f5bdda94fd4 gh-36553: Add a hash function for the class TernaryQF.
37f7f5d5028 gh-36552: `src/sage/misc/cython.py`: Fix the workaround for setuptools_scm
ccb093422cd gh-36550: remove deprecated name parameter in category ; capital for Coxeter
5c6004be074 gh-36547: expurge parent_old from cryptosystem
7c6cda9559f gh-36541: `build/pkgs/nauty`: Upgrade to 2.8.6, require nauty >= 2.8
c8299c7b1b6 gh-36540: `build/pkgs/pip`: Increase lower version bound; upgrade `pip`, `wheel`, `packaging`, `platformdirs`
970d7f27c88 gh-36537: refresh the maple(tm) interface
ee0adcdad3d gh-36535: build/pkgs/openssl: Update to 3.0.12
81665ba4a36 gh-36532: `pkgs/sagemath-standard`: Fix sdist
fef74127ec2 gh-36528: some cleanup in quadratic forms
d2523e70b00 gh-36522: Fix linter failure E401 multiple imports on one line
7c974480400 gh-36521: GH Actions: Fix wheel build
ac7ed0e2478 gh-36520: `pkgs/sagemath-{bliss,sirocco,tdlib}`: Fix sdists
dff2b2db763 gh-36516: `sage.schemes.toric`: Remove pyright 'is possibly unbound' warnings
f79dc7a181f gh-36514: `build/pkgs/sagenb_export`: Fix install-requires.txt
5eb0dba9618 gh-36513: `networkx`, `scipy`, `ipywidgets`: Update version ranges in `conda.txt`
15b24deb5d7 gh-36511: Exclude symlinks from vscode search config via glob pattern
0a0f14180e1 gh-36510: Add pyright ci annotations
97b06bd9b4c gh-36509: meson 1.2.3, numpy 1.26.1, require meson >= 1.2.0
1185345f0f4 gh-36507: Fix implicit noexcept warnings
5b0af6777f8 gh-36506: Support launching notebook 7
b0569410e72 gh-36499: Remove conda patchelf distro
a49c36b8d50 gh-36497: lint.yml: Always run all 3 linters
ca7de640ef3 gh-36496: build*.yml: Fix application of CI fixes broken in #36442
26dca91d79e gh-36495: Conditional documentation
2c7b52eb7e6 gh-36493: improve method `cycle_basis` for graphs with multiple edges
6d304484897 gh-36491: Fix size of varchenko_matrix
7a37e8ff681 gh-36488: Fix func_persist: do not use the (now removed) inspect.formatargspec, but instead use inspect.signature.
4d20a26e6fb gh-36484: Fix typos in Italian docs
83dcc176064 gh-36483: Remove spurious diffs in doc build changes
d052d9f99e3 gh-36482: Loosen version requirement on fpylll and align its conda version
4e658387593 gh-36478: some details in pyx files in combinat
b297c4d8ec7 gh-36475: .github/workflows/doc-build.yml: Repair display of changes
9d3e427285a gh-36466: Run incremental linux ci only when packages changed
a1e100a22e6 gh-36462: using ruff for UP004, UP008, UP028
980f28c681d gh-36444: upgrade cypari2 to 2.1.4
b62d8401917 gh-36416: `build/pkgs/cython`: Update to 3.0.4
652d42948ef gh-36292: Fix sync labels issues for step 2 going live completion
6afeae8285b gh-36271: `sage.{dynamics,schemes}`: Modularization fixes, docstring cosmetics, update `# needs`
b42b3818706 gh-36246: Use URLs to online Sage documents for JupyterLab
c59ebbb4e18 gh-36144: Revive sage live doc using jupyter-sphinx
94682909ba4 gh-35302: update pari to 2.15.4, drop patch
07a2afd65fb (tag: 10.2.beta8) Updated SageMath version to 10.2.beta8

[John H Palmieri]

I don't see this yet on any mirrors.

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:29 PM John H Palmieri <jhpalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see this yet on any mirrors.

one can always use
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/archive/refs/tags/10.2.beta9.tar.gz
(this is unconfigured source, though, i.e. it would need ./bootstrap to be run)

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/0bef2957-1ae5-42cc-8b37-6d35e8a8f5fdn%40googlegroups.com.

[Volker Braun]

looks like the upload hit a network error, tarball is on the way to the mirrors now

[John H Palmieri]

I'm seeing one new failure on two different OS X machines (one Intel, one M2):

File "src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/mpoly_doctest.py", line 398, in sage.tests.books.computational-mathematics-with-sagemath.mpoly_doctest
Failed example:
    [CDF['x'](p(y=ys[0][0])).roots() for p in J.gens()] # abs tol 2e-15
Expected:
    [[(-0.5999999999999999, 1), (0.6000000000000001, 1)], [(0.6000000000000001, 1), (2.600000000000001, 1)]]
Got:
    [[(-0.5999999999999998, 1), (0.5999999999999999, 1)],
     [(0.6000000000000001 - 6.162975822039155e-33*I, 1),
      (2.6 + 3.0814879110195774e-32*I, 1)]]
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
   1 of 161 in sage.tests.books.computational-mathematics-with-sagemath.mpoly_doctest
    [160 tests, 1 failure, 9.54 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --random-seed=151162198507806711540314627633568329221 src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagemath/mpoly_doctest.py  # 1 doctest failed

On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 5:22:19 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:

[david....@gmail.com]

I'm seeing a new random failure on both MacOS and Fedora 35. The test passes with other random seeds.

sage -t --warn-long 33.1 --random-seed=119293255820329071348175335411518596036 src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py

**********************************************************************

File "src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py", line 206, in sage.tests.book_stein_ent

Failed example:

    decrypt(c, d, n)

Expected:

    123

Got:

    49

**********************************************************************

1 item had failures:

   1 of 257 in sage.tests.book_stein_ent

    [256 tests, 1 failure, 5.62 s]

sage -t --long --warn-long 33.1 --random-seed=316346340216019203823556085838607651488 src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py

    [261 tests, 5.91 s]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

All tests passed!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Total time for all tests: 6.0 seconds

    cpu time: 5.9 seconds

    cumulative wall time: 5.9 seconds

sage -t --long --warn-long 33.1 --random-seed=291401821193365627335310477024028027230 src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py

    [261 tests, 6.82 s]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

All tests passed!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Total time for all tests: 6.9 seconds

    cpu time: 7.4 seconds

    cumulative wall time: 6.8 seconds

[Dima Pasechnik]

I've added

--- a/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py
+++ b/src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ sage: def rsa(bits):
....: phi_n = (p-1) * (q-1)
....: while True:
....: e = ZZ.random_element(1,phi_n)
+....: print("e=", e)
....: if gcd(e,phi_n) == 1: break
....: d = lift(Mod(e,phi_n)^(-1))
....: return e, d, n

and see

sage -t --warn-long 33.1
--random-seed=119293255820329071348175335411518596036
src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py
**********************************************************************

File "src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py", line 205, in sage.tests.book_stein_ent
Failed example:
e,d,n = rsa(20)
Expected nothing
Got:
e= 4
e= 18
e= 22
e= 3
e= 18
e= 18
e= 11
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/tests/book_stein_ent.py", line 207, in sage.tests.book_stein_ent

Failed example:
decrypt(c, d, n)
Expected:
123
Got:
49

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

with a different seed I see

e= 659913
e= 1602755
e= 2633


(i.e. the e used will be 2633, as opposed to 11 with the random seed
in question)

So it's either an issue with ZZ.random_element(1,phi_n), or with the
need for e to be bigger (or both)

Someone versed in RSA should step in here.

Dima

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/622fab64-0cbe-4d21-859d-494ecb84f585n%40googlegroups.com.

[Dima Pasechnik]

I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:47 PM Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it

As I wrote on the issue above, here we get very small primes for the
RSA, 37 and 2, and
in particular 2 is probably breaking something in the implementation.

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:13 PM Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:47 PM Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've opened https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36624 to deal with it
> As I wrote on the issue above, here we get very small primes for the
> RSA, 37 and 2, and
> in particular 2 is probably breaking something in the implementation.

Indeed.
Fixed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36625 - please review