git question/request

[John H Palmieri]

Would it be a good idea for Sage tarballs, at least the development versions, to come with `upstream` defined already? With a fresh 10.0.beta6 tarball:

% git remote -v
trac https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror.git (fetch)
trac ssh://g...@trac.sagemath.org:2222/sage.git (push)

Should this also (or instead) define `upstream` as https://github.com/sagemath/sage.git?

--

John

[Matthias Koeppe]

Definitely +1

[Dima Pasechnik]

that's a bit unusual for tarballs to pack .git/

subdirectory. I think it just should not be there.

Anyway, these URLs are just plain wrong.

--

John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9c5fa356-feae-4c31-aa35-df56b27240d2n%40googlegroups.com.

[Matthias Koeppe]

On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:10:27 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:

that's a bit unusual for tarballs to pack .git/

subdirectory. I think it just should not be there.

It is placed there deliberately so that users can start development directly from an unpacked tarball.

 

[Dima Pasechnik]

well, good luck developing with such remotes :-)

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/b60423b3-f6aa-4259-9ee8-f72194c090d7n%40googlegroups.com.

[Matthias Koeppe]

Update in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35384