citations missing in pdf docs

[François Bissey]

Hi,

in the latest rc (8.8.rc3) and using texlive-2017 we have some missing references in
the pdf doc but not the html.
See https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/543
and note we have reproduced the issue in vanilla (not sage-on-gentoo) builds.

Because we don’t look at the pdf that often _and_ it is not fatal to the build,
there is no telling for how long it has been that way.

François

[François Bissey]

After some more testing there are missing citations in pdf doc with texlive 2019 too.

An example of document affected is 

en/reference/tensor_free_modules/tensor_free_modules.pdf

where there are citations missing on the first page of chapter one.

Francois

[Justin C. Walker]

I checked this with 8.8.rc3 on macOS 10.13.6, TL 2019. The problems seem to be more widespread: a quick check of a couple of reference PDFs show similar issues.

HTH

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
When LuteFisk is outlawed,
Only outlaws will have LuteFisk
--------

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 3:00 AM François Bissey <frp.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After some more testing there are missing citations in pdf doc with texlive 2019 too.
> An example of document affected is
> en/reference/tensor_free_modules/tensor_free_modules.pdf
> where there are citations missing on the first page of chapter one.

in fact, in the log one sees messages like this

Latexmk: Summary of warnings from last run of (pdf)latex:
Latex failed to resolve 96 citation(s)
Latexmk: All targets () are up-to-date
Build finished. The built documents can be found in
/mnt/opt/Sage/sage-dev/local/share/doc/sage/pdf/en/reference/manifolds

(this is for [manifolds] section)

Did sphinx use latexmk earlier too, or this is only from the recently
upgraded version?

>
> Francois
>
> On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 12:26:57 PM UTC+12, François Bissey wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the latest rc (8.8.rc3) and using texlive-2017 we have some missing references in
>> the pdf doc but not the html.
>> See https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/543
>> and note we have reproduced the issue in vanilla (not sage-on-gentoo) builds.
>>
>> Because we don’t look at the pdf that often _and_ it is not fatal to the build,
>> there is no telling for how long it has been that way.
>>
>> François
>

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/e9813243-4d99-4ffa-bbb8-6ef9b12b583a%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[François Bissey]

I don’t have logs going that far back. Someone would have to build 8.7 to figure that out.

[Dima Pasechnik]

In fact, it's the default sphinx setup since 1.6 or so.

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/FAD2C94E-29EF-4243-ADDB-24BC71EC271E%40gmail.com.