browser simulator independent of web framework

[Martin L.]

Hi all,

Is there any browser simulator that fulfills these requirements:

- gem written in Ruby
- automatically performing Ajax and Javascript code (XSS is not an issue in my case)
- independent of the frameworks used by the website (Rails, JavaEE, ASP.NET, ...)
- only client-side
- no testing
- no browser dependency

Thanks in advance
Martin

[Colin Law]

What do you mean 'no testing'? If not for testing then what is it for?

Colin

[Martin Luy]

I'm extracting content from some websites. Currently I evaluate HTML code using Nokogiri. But the relevant content is not contained in the responded body of the HTTP GET request. This is because there is some Javascript code like $(window).load() or $(document).ready() that will send some Ajax requests and fill the original HTML code.

So I'm searching for some library that automatically executes Javascript code and Ajax requests just like a normal browser.

Martin

Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Colin Law <cla...@gmail.com>
Datum: 18.06.17 09:42 (GMT+01:00)
An: "Ruby on Rails: Talk" <rubyonra...@googlegroups.com>
Betreff: Re: [Rails] browser simulator independent of web framework

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rubyonrails-talk/H_YImOIzNNo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAL%3D0gLvqHArcWpbZ5gsfCiPg0EF%3D4kD8QzZbC3KnicN58uAZ8A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Colin Law]

On 18 June 2017 at 12:21, Martin Luy <marti...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I'm extracting content from some websites. Currently I evaluate HTML code
> using Nokogiri. But the relevant content is not contained in the responded
> body of the HTTP GET request. This is because there is some Javascript code
> like $(window).load() or $(document).ready() that will send some Ajax
> requests and fill the original HTML code.
>
> So I'm searching for some library that automatically executes Javascript
> code and Ajax requests just like a normal browser.

Understood. Don't think I can help I am afraid. Does the site not work
with js disabled in the browser?

Colin

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/smyckbsskql3om4h9odf01hm.1497784510166%40email.android.com.

[Martin L.]

Am Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 14:37:12 UTC+2 schrieb Colin Law:

On 18 June 2017 at 12:21, Martin Luy <marti...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I'm extracting content from some websites. Currently I evaluate HTML code
> using Nokogiri. But the relevant content is not contained in the responded
> body of the HTTP GET request. This is because there is some Javascript code
> like $(window).load() or $(document).ready() that will send some Ajax
> requests and fill the original HTML code.
>
> So I'm searching for some library that automatically executes Javascript
> code and Ajax requests just like a normal browser.

Understood. Don't think I can help I am afraid. Does the site not work
with js disabled in the browser?

Colin

Unfortunately they completely rely on js, there's nothing working without.

Is there some tool coming close to my use case, or some testing tool that I could use for my purpose without writing test?

Martin

[Jason Fleetwood-Boldt]

I think he's scraping someone else's site. 

You obviously can't do this with Ruby alone, as there is no headless web browser written entirely in Ruby (that's just nonsense)

If you can get phantomjs working on your production site, that's probably the way to go. Look deep into the internals of Capybara to understand how it drives phantomjs. With phantomjs, you basically have a headless web browser and you can use Capybara's DSL to access parts of the page, including evaluating scripts and parsing the DOM.

Just keep in mind phantomjs is an actual executable so it needs to be compiled and built for your production environment explicitly, which might be a little tricky depending on where your site is. 

But a little birdie told me a few months ago that the phantomjs team has decided that once Chrome has a headless mode, which I believe is forthcoming, they plan to abandon phantomjs in favor of Chrome's headless mode. Not sure if that's really true or when that will happen. 

-Jason

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CAL%3D0gLsaS8DzC2o0%3DHkKt_%2BMvvzqutm0mSHUj5jf7CoKvnqJEg%40mail.gmail.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

----

Jason Fleetwood-Boldt
te...@datatravels.com
http://www.jasonfleetwoodboldt.com/writing

If you'd like to reply by encrypted email you can find my public key on jasonfleetwoodboldt.com (more about setting GPG: https://gpgtools.org) 

[Walter Lee Davis]

Also look at Mechanize, which I believe can do a headless JS scrape of a site. It's purely a scraper, so less likely to be so test-centric.

Walter

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/A0A534AE-3ECA-41F9-9170-432A98DD743D%40datatravels.com.

[Martin L.]

Thanks guys.. I'm trying Capybara with Poltergeist / phantomjs and the hints from https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara#calling-remote-servers. I'll post my experiences here again.

Martin