[Feature] Support parsing msgpack parameters natively

[Hirad Y.]

I'd like to request to support parsing MsgPack parameters along with other already available parsers (i.e. json and xml parsers).

Thanks

[Kasper Hansen]

Hey,

I don’t see the reason for why we would accept a PR to add that parsing within Rails. Make a gem ✌️

--
Kasper

On 23 Sep 2019, 10.52 +0200, Hirad Y. <hir...@gmail.com>, wrote:

I'd like to request to support parsing MsgPack parameters along with other already available parsers (i.e. json and xml parsers).

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-co...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-core/c7f4d5ef-4a62-46f6-bd43-e571d52ac359%40googlegroups.com.

[Hirad Y.]

Hi Kasper, thanks for your reply. Why not?! parsing json/xml parameters are built, but not msgpack? I understand it is more of a binary format, but can be simply wrapped in with params hash in specific order, which correspond to activerecord attributes. I'm failing to see the reason for your ambiguous straightforward `no` answer!

On Saturday, 28 September 2019 20:08:33 UTC+1, Kasper Timm Hansen wrote:

Hey,

I don’t see the reason for why we would accept a PR to add that parsing within Rails. Make a gem ✌️

--
Kasper

On 23 Sep 2019, 10.52 +0200, Hirad Y. <hir...@gmail.com>, wrote:

I'd like to request to support parsing MsgPack parameters along with other already available parsers (i.e. json and xml parsers).

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.

[Kasper Hansen]

This isn’t really fruitful. You’re volunteering this discussion, so it’s on you to provide reasons. Which could be benefits of msgpack compared to xml/json, how does browsers support it, performance benchmarks, a gist with an attempt at a patch, etc.

Instead your request boils down to “I want msgpack, so you should write it and maintain it because I said so”. To which the only answer is: nope.

Making a gem is the only way I see this moving forward, then there’d be something to talk about ✌️

--
Kasper

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-co...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-core/7bff5f66-6276-4e96-b05d-6560598c95d7%40googlegroups.com.

[Hirad Y.]

I think it's best to stop this conversation right here, as I understand there's a huge lack of interest/knowledge on employing http/2 in future versions of Rails, and also Rails is not only used in web and can be used as a web api to any other application. 

I was at least hoping for a better discussion with an open mind contributor here than one who's ignoring any other possibilities to even get into a discussion than claiming to be "I am a Rails contributor, therefore all I say is the final fact!"

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-core/7bff5f66-6276-4e96-b05d-6560598c95d7%40googlegroups.com.

[Hirad Y.]

FYI, the gem already exist if bother looking around!