Need help decoding OOK Manchester

211 views
Skip to first unread message

Obl Ogis

unread,
Jan 18, 2022, 10:46:07 AM1/18/22
to rtl_433
Hello,
I have captured this signal with rtl_433 which is said to be OOK Manchester.
Can someone help me building the flex decoder?
Thanks in advance!
g013_433.92M_250k.cu8

Christian Z.

unread,
Jan 18, 2022, 11:13:48 AM1/18/22
to rtl_433
Doesn't look like Manchester. Also it's clipping (too "loud") which distorts the demodulation.

Karl Lohner

unread,
Jan 18, 2022, 1:36:31 PM1/18/22
to rtl_433
Using [rtl_433 -r g013_433.92M_250k.cu8 -R 0 -X "n=UNK,m=OOK_PCM,s=216,l=216,g=648,r=864,t=12"]  I see the raw bits from this sample, but due to signal quality these bits seem incorrect in spots.

The actual bit decoding should be something like "{360}aaaa9c56595556556665a66659556956a6595a9a6a999a6a595555565a9aaaa6aa555565a5559655595a5a65a4" which may be some kind of Manchester encoding.



On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:13 AM Christian Z. <chri...@zuckschwerdt.org> wrote:
Doesn't look like Manchester. Also it's clipping (too "loud") which distorts the demodulation.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtl_433" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtl_433+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rtl_433/c050235a-289f-4db9-98d7-10f55ed25a18n%40googlegroups.com.

Christian Z.

unread,
Jan 18, 2022, 2:22:37 PM1/18/22
to rtl_433
Great job manually demodding the signal! Could really be DMC. I was fooled by what seemed length 3x and 4x pulses ;)

Obl Ogis

unread,
Jan 19, 2022, 10:46:39 AM1/19/22
to rtl_433
Thanks much Karl! There is the preamble I was looking for: 'aaaa9c', though the rest seems to be garbage.
Is there any rtl_433 parameter that I can use to obtain a better signal?

Karl Lohner

unread,
Jan 19, 2022, 4:34:46 PM1/19/22
to Obl Ogis, rtl_433
Your signal is very close to the center frequency you've tuned to, 433.92M, but this isn't actually desirable to avoid interference.

Try offsetting the center frequency by 100kHz or so one way or another, for example -f 433.8M or -f 434M.  You might also see if a sampling rate higher than 250k improves anything.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages