Thanks for asking Eleanor
Well, I dont have anything in mind particularly but at the back of the independent scholarship argument *vs institutional
scholarship is epistemic freedom, isn't there?
I wonder for example what is the body of literature surrounding 'classified' knowledge
Aren't independent scholars supposed to be asking questions and intelligent responses?
I have some drafts waiting to be advanced, here is one of them
Let me know if it inspires anything
Classified by who? Why? Classified
to make sure the public opinion continues to stay misinformed about the state of play?
This is serious in politics, but also in science.
There is also the issue of what does it mean 'being an American' , and being lied to by the founding institutions
Was MLK assassination an insider job? Has academia tackled the issue of classified knowledge?
*many wars and conflicts, and historical events are inside jobs, the result of direct manipulative interventions
I tackle systemic deviation in previous cycles, where things become distorted
file:///C:/Users/paola/Downloads/3512-Article%20Text-12372-1-10-20200409-2.pdf
I also addressed this as 'systemic aberration'
and the role it plays in psychological abuse
It came up here on this list as well
On a cognitive level, there is confounding, mislabelling of things aimed at creating confusion *
from a knowledge mis representation point of view , And now there is AI.
Is AI going to be used to spread knowledge or disinformation?
And what is the role of independent scholars in all this?
Lots of angles, what pulls for you and others?
When I joined Ronin Institute years back I saw the opportunity to have informed exchanges on foundational issues with
great learned people, but intelligent and informed discourse so far has been limited
Look forward to continued exchanges
Best regards
Paola