Skip to first unread message

NZ0I

unread,
Jun 1, 2017, 3:08:59 PM6/1/17
to Receiver Development Platform
After spending some time investigating the MicroChip RN171 802.11 b/g Wireless LAN Module, I discovered that is is not recommended for new designs.

MicroChip offers a new improved product (the ATWINC1500) that, remarkably enough, is significantly cheaper than the RN171, and should perform better. One downside for our current design: the ATWINC1500 uses SPI to communicate with the host computer, instead of UART. The ATmega328P has SPI support, so we could adapt to the new product, but...

MicroChip is not the only game in town. STMicroelectronics offers a competing module (the SPWF01) that seems to meet MicroChip's new product's spec, and supports UART and has its own built-in antenna, and some other cool features, like over-the-air updates. Prices seem to be in the under $20 range, some closer to $15.

I haven't decided on the best WLAN WiFi module yet; there is still some investigating to do. But one thing I'm becoming more convinced of is that a WiFi module and a portable smart device running an app, are a better option than building our own Control Head. A smartphone or tablet offers everything that our Control Head design has, only better integrated, more powerful, more portable, and for most folks much less expensive. The Control Head would cost close to $100 to build, and probably considerably more if fully loaded with GPS, digital compass, real-time clock, and a more powerful processor capable of handling all the data from those peripherals.

If you already own a smartphone or suitable tablet, then there would be no added cost for you: just download a free app. If you do not own a smart device, you can purchase a used one, probably for less than the cost of building a less-capable Control Head... and no surface mount soldering! No cellular plan would be required either; WiFi and GPS will function on a smartphone without an active SIM card.

I will add a WiFi module option to the transmitter design. And I'm leaning toward mothballing the Control Head concept, and focusing instead on adding WiFi capability to the receiver, and a USB power port so that a smartphone can be charging while being used as part of the receiver. Work already done on the Control Head would remain available, should anyone want to use it, or a portion of its design.

This change in plans would alter the design of a 3D chassis for the receiver: instead of an LCD display and pushbuttons, we'll want perhaps a flat location to velcro a smartphone and have it protected from the elements, yet have its touchscreen accessible. Perhaps an Otterbox could be velcro'd in place?

As always, I welcome comments, concerns, or alternative ideas.





Gerald Boyd

unread,
Jun 1, 2017, 10:52:48 PM6/1/17
to NZ0I, Receiver Development Platform
Charles I think this is the way to go. The value and flexibility for the price is good.
This direction  moves the user interface from the hard to change hardware world. Rotary encoders switches pots etc that needs hardware mods and new boards to change to a system that is a software driven user interface that can change with just a software update.

The following photo are from the Internet and shows how the drone controllers are going down the same path.
image1.jpeg

image2.jpeg
image3.jpeg
Sent from my iPad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Receiver Development Platform" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to receiver-development...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/receiver-development-platform/158793d7-ea13-45fc-93a5-7ef8ef50dfb3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Charles Scharlau

unread,
Jun 2, 2017, 8:15:03 AM6/2/17
to Gerald Boyd, Receiver Development Platform
Those drone controller designs illustrate the concept well. In our application we would want the housing to protect the phone from tree branches and bushes, and to totally shield the charging cable from getting snagged. An Otterbox or similar is probably the best option for protecting the phone from the elements while preserving the functioning of the touchscreen and buttons. The setup doesn't have to be indestructible and waterproof, just durable and protected.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to receiver-development-platform+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages