How about defining each backplane as an RC2014. The way I see it (and you're welcome to disagree) the "soul" of the whole thing is the backplane, because it lets people go on their own RC2014 "journey", rather than just building a single board computer, bashing about in BASIC or CP/M for a bit and then moving on to the next kit.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rc201...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/7c0888da-dfd9-47eb-8f8f-c1389e0c4234%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Something akin to a wiki or something? Would love to see a collection of howtos and idea pages; compile your own code, install zork, the missing details from bakers ctc card to the whole unix thing.
See a lot of cool stuff on youtube from time to time, but a lot of it is "see what I can do" without the "you can do it too" (guides and schematics). A common site would provide a means to do that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rc201...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/19e55272-49df-4cdd-bed5-31bc4560f417%40googlegroups.com.
That would be good .. Then I can move all the data in my private Wiki over to the public one.DAVEOn Thu, 2017-07-27 at 01:28 -0700, Ed Brindley wrote:
A wiki does sounds like a good idea, there's a lot of info in this group but it's hard to find things! The NASCOM BASIC documentation that someone kindly typed up so it's searchable, my spreadsheet of components for Scott Baker's boards that PianoMatt has also contributed to etc etc...--On Wednesday, 26 July 2017 23:32:32 UTC+1, Tor-Eirik Bakke Lunde wrote:Considering the amount of options available and the complexity of things, wouldn't it be time for a collaborative effort on the documentation side?Something akin to a wiki or something? Would love to see a collection of howtos and idea pages; compile your own code, install zork, the missing details from bakers ctc card to the whole unix thing.
See a lot of cool stuff on youtube from time to time, but a lot of it is "see what I can do" without the "you can do it too" (guides and schematics). A common site would provide a means to do that.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/bd01ab75-54f0-45ee-a38f-d0d7b2193c31%40googlegroups.com.
Is it possible to spin it up via wikia?For personal wiki, I've been using W2-wiki for years. Markdown formatting, flat file system, no database. Although it had one password to access everything so...S
Sent from your iPhone.
Will wait to see what Spencer thinks as I don't want to tread on his toes! :)--Cost should be fairly low and I'd say administration be open to known members off here who are interested?Another option could be using the Wiki on the RC2014 GitHub repo, but I think GitHub wikis are a bit inflexible.I think the key is log as the content is free and open (i.e. in git) so it can be forked/rehosted etc we'll be good.Cheers,Ed
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 12:57:59 UTC+1, Peter Fielden-Weston wrote:Hi All,
I think a wiki is a very good idea. But!
- Who would administer it?
- Would it be members only?
- Would it be moderated?
- Who pays for the website?
I have used a wiki system before and it very quickly got swamped with spam. Loads and loads and loads of spam. I took it down.
Peter
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rc201...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/bd01ab75-54f0-45ee-a38f-d0d7b2193c31%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rc2014-z80/KBmXEPnOIps/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rc2014-z80+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rc201...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/76ACFF20-5AAC-4578-8332-A8D2F95FDD43%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/CAMAmWf%3Dv6%3D84gOvjgeR33xGviZ%2B4WkLSLnzCHKyR5UpyYxX1mw%40mail.gmail.com.
I thought I'd put a simple question to you all, just to see what you think; What is a RC2014. Or, more specifically, what particular combination of components or modules make up a RC2014?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RC2014-Z80" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rc2014-z80+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rc201...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rc2014-z80/705f6e2d-c026-4b6f-bd0c-a77055dc4616%40googlegroups.com.