I don't understand triple rings instead of triple cogs; much easier to shift in back than in front, and besides you get more gear ratio difference per tooth in back than in front.
I do agree that, if you are going to use an 8 speed cassette hub, you might as well have 8 cogs even if you don't often use all of them.
As for shifting mismatched cogs: indexing seems to suffer a bit with cassettes constructed from miscellaneous cogs from the big box, but IME it's not all that bad; sometimes you have to replace adjacent cogs to get them to work well together, but generally it works well -- have done this on a couple of drivetrains, 7 speed and 9 speed. With friction, OTOH, mismatched cogs -- and I'm talking about 7, 8, 9, and 10 sp, as well as Uniglide, all in the mix -- works very well, better than, IME, or at veryt least as well as, the old, pre- HG and pre-UG freewheels. I shift a home-made 13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25 (or is it 26?) cassette on my dirt road bike made from who knows what mix of scavenged cogs, using SunTour barcons (old Dura Ace rd), and it is wonderful.
I've already had a wheel built for my 2003 26" wheel Riv Road custom replacement using a 1956 Sturmey Archer AM hub with 0.8654 / 1.0 / 1.115 ratios, basically the equivalent of 2 teeth in the middle gear range -- say 55" - 63" - 70". The (God willing) new bike -- plans to discuss with Chauncey next week -- will be adjusted to preserve the impeccable handling with road -- 28 to 32 mm -- tires, but hopefully also take 42s and fenders. I do ride the 28 mm Elk Passes on dirt already, so this new one may be a nice, close ratio all rounder.