Recommended workaround still the same?
21 views
Skip to first unread message
Nate Griswold
Aug 2, 2020, 4:47:35 PM8/2/20
to Racket Users
Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings.
Is this (https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/766) still the recommended way of working around the issue?
Nate
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Aug 2, 2020, 4:50:40 PM8/2/20
to Nate Griswold, Racket Users
Yes, I think that's still the best approach.
Sam
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPoRnfw%3DEwLQjq2Qwqhc56Mx5bZ7wyeaXWD1GWeN3mwG5w%40mail.gmail.com.
Sam
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPoRnfw%3DEwLQjq2Qwqhc56Mx5bZ7wyeaXWD1GWeN3mwG5w%40mail.gmail.com.
Nate Griswold
Aug 2, 2020, 4:55:30 PM8/2/20
to Sam Tobin-Hochstadt, Racket Users
Thanks
Nate
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages