I think it's a problem with the package server's calculation of mutual
dependencies. It generates the build plan
functional-doc
collections-doc
collections-lib collections functional-lib
where the third step there correctly identifies three packages as
needing to be built together, because they're mutually dependent.
However, "functional-doc" and "collections-doc" should be in the same
mutually dependent set --- because "functional-doc" depends on
"functional-lib", which depends on "collections", which depends on
collections-doc".
I'll work on this as soon as I can. Meanwhile, you might have intended
for "functional-lib" to depend on "collections-lib", and it's possible
that change avoid the bug in the dependency calculation.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
racket-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to
racke...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/B7D9731F-E236-4023-8996-C5055A761E
> 25%
40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.