New Qubes installer image?

141 views
Skip to first unread message

lok...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 5:58:52 AM3/20/17
to qubes-users
Since Qubes cannot be easily installed if things like networking or graphics is not available during installation, is there any plan to create a new installer image that has newer drivers?

On my old Dell Latitude E7470, I was unable to get WLAN working until I had performed a dom0 update. I was lucky to have access to a wired connection at the time, but if I had not, this would have been a difficult problem.

The newest laptop I have is a Dell Latitude 7480, where pretty much nothing works using the drivers that are included in the installer (To be fair, this machine is new enough that I'm doubtful that even the latest dom0 update would have support for it. But that does not change the question).

Are there any plans to create an updated installer image?

Regards,
Elias

Andrew David Wong

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 10:01:57 PM3/20/17
to lok...@gmail.com, qubes-users, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
We almost never publish new ISOs for Qubes OS versions that have
already been released. It's likely that the next time a new ISO will
be published with updated drivers will be when Qubes 4.0 is released.

- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yr5F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

lok...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 10:11:09 PM3/20/17
to qubes-users, lok...@gmail.com, marm...@invisiblethingslab.com
On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 10:01:57 UTC+8, Andrew David Wong wrote:

> We almost never publish new ISOs for Qubes OS versions that have
> already been released. It's likely that the next time a new ISO will
> be published with updated drivers will be when Qubes 4.0 is released.

Thank you for the honest reply, even if it's one that causes me some amount of trouble.

The fact Qubes 3.2 can't be installed on modern hardware is problematic, so here's hoping that Qubes 4 will be out in a reasonable amount of time.

Now for a question:

In a recent post you asked people to try the beta repositories. In that email there was a link to instructions how to build the ISO image. If I were to do that, would that image contain the latest kernel and drivers? If so, that could possibly be a solution to the problem of installing 3.2 on a modern laptop.

Regards,
Elias

Andrew David Wong

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 10:15:12 PM3/20/17
to lok...@gmail.com, qubes-users, marm...@invisiblethingslab.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I suspect so, but I have very little experience with building Qubes
from source, so I'm hoping that someone more knowledgeable will be
able to answer your question.

- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=DJ0W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

unread,
Mar 20, 2017, 10:19:34 PM3/20/17
to Andrew David Wong, lok...@gmail.com, qubes-users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:01:43PM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> On 2017-03-20 02:58, lok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Since Qubes cannot be easily installed if things like networking or
> > graphics is not available during installation, is there any plan to
> > create a new installer image that has newer drivers?
> >
> > On my old Dell Latitude E7470, I was unable to get WLAN working
> > until I had performed a dom0 update. I was lucky to have access to
> > a wired connection at the time, but if I had not, this would have
> > been a difficult problem.
> >
> > The newest laptop I have is a Dell Latitude 7480, where pretty much
> > nothing works using the drivers that are included in the installer
> > (To be fair, this machine is new enough that I'm doubtful that even
> > the latest dom0 update would have support for it. But that does not
> > change the question).
> >
> > Are there any plans to create an updated installer image?
> >
> > Regards, Elias
> >
>
> We almost never publish new ISOs for Qubes OS versions that have
> already been released. It's likely that the next time a new ISO will
> be published with updated drivers will be when Qubes 4.0 is released.

Actually, for Qubes Os 3.2, which will be supported for a while, we do plan
release new ISO image, lets name it Qubes OS 3.2.1. It will have updated
templates, especially newer default Fedora template, and also updated
kernel. We haven't decided for specific versions yet, but I'd like to
have Fedora 25 and kernel 4.9.x there. Both need some testing first and
need to hit stable repository before building new ISO image (kernel
4.9.x isn't even in testing repository yet).

- --
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJY0I2xAAoJENuP0xzK19csd+0H/3WvmjHYLA7FezXobPlAGuqJ
gwc7zFZtUVjjLJYbHCsdkC4xclrGkrDFjUfqwwyhhqwnpaajVwnJ/7WLPe/D25yD
X5TTBfFNvcbIPEd2bonoOiuScZlXncyk3tVADuO016dDSbAPGHXj/bLPaM+lr07A
BjzUWasbDDR2XZ0Ycq1cVt7WMTF45ZFzrZhTC8cxRKf2nA4Lgw5fjzY9+lavEOVN
qe+ion46p8cLiZadx/CzkdY1MfumCxOIam31sda2UkGnS7vyOIjwAdZJd3cdGTnZ
feHBmhF/jCgPK+60an4zdPp63e7vCGzeHc2qJI9+u1eoV/w8KeVs9D3of4FzZMs=
=KfnL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Jean-Philippe Ouellet

unread,
Mar 21, 2017, 2:44:37 AM3/21/17
to Marek Marczykowski-Górecki, Andrew David Wong, Elias Mårtenson, qubes-users
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marm...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
>> We almost never publish new ISOs for Qubes OS versions that have
>> already been released. It's likely that the next time a new ISO will
>> be published with updated drivers will be when Qubes 4.0 is released.
>
> Actually, for Qubes Os 3.2, which will be supported for a while, we do plan
> release new ISO image, lets name it Qubes OS 3.2.1. It will have updated
> templates, especially newer default Fedora template, and also updated
> kernel. We haven't decided for specific versions yet, but I'd like to
> have Fedora 25 and kernel 4.9.x there. Both need some testing first and
> need to hit stable repository before building new ISO image (kernel
> 4.9.x isn't even in testing repository yet).

Also quite notably with a debian template past the apt InRelease vuln.
I wonder how many people make new installs and update debian via
package updates in the existing template without knowing they should
first replace it via qubes-dom0-update.

IMHO revisiting the ISO publication frequency may not be a bad idea,
especially with all the recent build automation improvements making
this somehow less work. (Or at least it appears to be less work from
my outside perspective... I do not pretend to know everything
involved.)

Mike Keehan

unread,
Mar 21, 2017, 5:40:06 AM3/21/17
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:19:28 +0100
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marm...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:01:43PM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> > On 2017-03-20 02:58, lok...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > We almost never publish new ISOs for Qubes OS versions that have
> > already been released. It's likely that the next time a new ISO will
> > be published with updated drivers will be when Qubes 4.0 is
> > released.
>
> Actually, for Qubes Os 3.2, which will be supported for a while, we
> do plan release new ISO image, lets name it Qubes OS 3.2.1. It will
> have updated templates, especially newer default Fedora template, and
> also updated kernel. We haven't decided for specific versions yet,
> but I'd like to have Fedora 25 and kernel 4.9.x there. Both need some
> testing first and need to hit stable repository before building new
> ISO image (kernel 4.9.x isn't even in testing repository yet).
>

I had problems installing Qubes on my new laptop (Dell xps15).
Initially, I was booting the USB stick using legacy boot mode,
but could not get the graphics screen to work in the installer.

By sheer chance, it booted in UEFI mode at one point, and with
this mode the graphics display worked OK. And Qubes installed
without further problem.

I haven't gone back to find out what differences there are
in the boot sequences for legacy mode and UEFI mode, but it
might be worth checking if they are different in some way.

Regards,

Mike.

roberto...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2017, 8:41:39 PM3/21/17
to qubes-users, a...@qubes-os.org, lok...@gmail.com
Regarding "Qubes OS 3.2.1" new ISO... would the AMD Ryzen CPU be supported?

Foppe de Haan

unread,
Mar 22, 2017, 3:28:35 AM3/22/17
to qubes-users, a...@qubes-os.org, lok...@gmail.com, roberto...@gmail.com
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 1:41:39 AM UTC+1, roberto...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:19:34 PM UTC-7, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:01:43PM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
Based on my own experience (AMD 845), IOMMU probably won't work, because it's not recognized properly in Xen's 4.6 branch. I'm guessing the same will apply to RyZen.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages