WTF with userbase counter? Is Qubes OS dying?
72 views
Skip to first unread message
Arqwer
Sep 4, 2016, 7:16:38 AM9/4/16
to qubes-users
Statistics page (https://www.qubes-os.org/counter/) shows that number of users have fallen from 15 000 to less then 4000. Is it just a bug in counter, or what is happening?
Arqwer
Sep 4, 2016, 7:37:26 AM9/4/16
to qubes-users
Hmm, I guess that last column does not represent any info at beginning of month. (I hope so.) I think it should not be shown, to prevent misunderstanding.
Cube
Sep 4, 2016, 10:48:20 AM9/4/16
to qubes-users
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 4:16:38 AM UTC-7, Arqwer wrote:
> Statistics page (https://www.qubes-os.org/counter/) shows that number of users have fallen from 15 000 to less then 4000. Is it just a bug in counter, or what is happening?
> Statistics page (https://www.qubes-os.org/counter/) shows that number of users have fallen from 15 000 to less then 4000. Is it just a bug in counter, or what is happening?
glitch in the Matrix
Andrew David Wong
Sep 4, 2016, 11:10:17 AM9/4/16
to Arqwer, qubes-users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-09-04 04:37, Arqwer wrote:
> Hmm, I guess that last column does not represent any info at
> beginning of month. (I hope so.)
Correct. As it says on that page, "The graph is updated daily," and
the last date and time of update is in the lower left hand corner of
the image, immediately below the graph. So, the data for 2016-09
(September 2016) is all the data available through 2016-04-09 at
05:09. Naturally, fewer connections have occurred in the past four
days than in the past entire month. No cause for alarm.
> I think it should not be shown, to prevent misunderstanding.
>
IMHO, the information accompanying the graph (as explained above) is
sufficient.
- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=MSCf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-09-04 04:37, Arqwer wrote:
> Hmm, I guess that last column does not represent any info at
> beginning of month. (I hope so.)
the last date and time of update is in the lower left hand corner of
the image, immediately below the graph. So, the data for 2016-09
(September 2016) is all the data available through 2016-04-09 at
05:09. Naturally, fewer connections have occurred in the past four
days than in the past entire month. No cause for alarm.
> I think it should not be shown, to prevent misunderstanding.
>
sufficient.
- --
Andrew David Wong (Axon)
Community Manager, Qubes OS
https://www.qubes-os.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=MSCf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages