size difference between 4.9 and 4.14 kernels

51 views
Skip to first unread message

Holger Levsen

unread,
Feb 6, 2018, 6:04:51 AM2/6/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
hi,

on 3.2 I ran "sudo qubes-dom0-update" this morning, followed by "sudo
qubes-dom0-update --enablerepo=qubes-dom0-current-testing --action=upgrade kernel-qubes-vm"
which then prompted me with this:

Installing:
kernel x86_64 1000:4.14.13-3.pvops.qubes qubes-dom0-cached 46 M
kernel-qubes-vm x86_64 1000:4.14.13-3.pvops.qubes qubes-dom0-cached 62 M
Removing:
kernel x86_64 1000:4.9.35-20.pvops.qubes @qubes-dom0-cached 179 M
kernel-qubes-vm x86_64 1000:4.9.35-20.pvops.qubes @qubes-dom0-cached 206 M

Is that really expected and correct that the new kernels are that much
smaller?


--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

unread,
Feb 7, 2018, 5:01:49 AM2/7/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I think this is just about estimation of used disk space - one package
is already installed and rpm know how much disk space is really used,
the other one have only some estimation in rpm metadata.

RPM package sizes are very similar: 41M (4.9) vs 46M (4.14).

- --
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhrpukzGPukRmQqkK24/THMrX1ywFAlp6zn0ACgkQ24/THMrX
1yxppgf/eRkovw1Hjo/1buWrYDcLtakItPwUbJboYpxyU4bbMbpc6Kt4BGo3L7O1
1oC4JuNCb+SjobVR4mWBLgc0fZKvyqr77abFUWI4ejHAN+uxx0/SfqWJeiXBGc6F
JAE73FEzxMDbF4TohPqfSu+Ej1sLHZ3L6BQwOUEJ997hWGekqBS1nwoqVPzR8UDh
/Pd821jGTWLptGVwjuOj2CVr5hXhP+O/J5xoBjI5hq42swhE19hrFK2LzLZknwq6
u8Js9xODIxQjDHwxl3wsYSpATiF+pycV0W4/xXVZR2niEozxpdBtjqUs5iLjpPPq
kijZOJQbpUa21g+wGzYwcoOBzGc/QA==
=4a2H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Holger Levsen

unread,
Feb 8, 2018, 6:38:26 AM2/8/18
to qubes...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:01:33AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> I think this is just about estimation of used disk space - one package
> is already installed and rpm know how much disk space is really used,
> the other one have only some estimation in rpm metadata.

ah, right. I'm a fedora newbee! :)

> RPM package sizes are very similar: 41M (4.9) vs 46M (4.14).

thanks for confirming this.

sadly I now have issues with resume (5 failures on 5 tries), see
update-status #398...


--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages