PNG or JPG

78 views
Skip to first unread message

fg

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 11:59:46 AM4/25/23
to QLab
I know this has prob been asked before but I couldn't find a definitive solution

It seems both are fine, but JPG produces much smaller file sizes

I know the size of the image is a factor, but is is the KB?

My project is getting pretty huge now (over 1000 PNGs) and starting to grind a little...

Thanks

Sam Kusnetz

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 12:05:57 PM4/25/23
to ql...@googlegroups.com
Hello fg

On Apr 25, 2023 at 11:59:46 AM, fg <friendl...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know this has prob been asked before but I couldn't find a definitive solution

It seems both are fine, but JPG produces much smaller file sizes


I’m not clear on what you’re asking here.



I know the size of the image is a factor, but is is the KB?


A factor in what? And by “size” I assume you mean pixel dimensions, and by “KB” I assume you mean file size. Is that accurate?


My project is getting pretty huge now (over 1000 PNGs) and starting to grind a little...

Can you describe in more detail what you mean by “grind”?

Best
Sam

Sam Kusnetz (he/him) | Figure 53

fg

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 12:12:57 PM4/25/23
to QLab
Sorry for non-sensical post!

I wondered does Qlab load smaller file-sizes quicker than larger ones? 

Say, you have a PNG 1920x1080 that's 1MB vs a JPG that's also 1920x1080 but 200k

Hopefully that's worded better!

Sam Kusnetz

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 1:01:18 PM4/25/23
to ql...@googlegroups.com
On Apr 25, 2023 at 12:12:57 PM, fg <friendl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for non-sensical post!

I wondered does Qlab load smaller file-sizes quicker than larger ones? 

Say, you have a PNG 1920x1080 that's 1MB vs a JPG that's also 1920x1080 but 200k

Hopefully that's worded better!

Aha, that makes perfect sense!

The answer is yes, smaller files will load faster than larger ones, all other things being equal.

This is not always the case of course; mp3 files are 1/10th the size of AIFF files, but take more processing power to decode. H.264 videos are much smaller than ProRes, but take MUCH more processing power to decode.

BUT

If your workspace shows meaningful performance differences between 1MB still images and 200kB still images, then that might be a sign that your computer is not up to this task. 1MB is still a really small file to a modern computer.

fg

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 1:03:22 PM4/25/23
to QLab
Great thanks. I'll convert them all to JPG then

It's a MacBook Air M2, so not slow! 

I went back to Qlab 4 though, I think Qlab 5 wasn't as fast

Sam Kusnetz

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 2:50:01 PM4/25/23
to ql...@googlegroups.com
On Apr 25, 2023 at 1:03:21 PM, fg <friendl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Great thanks. I'll convert them all to JPG then

It's a MacBook Air M2, so not slow! 

I went back to Qlab 4 though, I think Qlab 5 wasn't as fast

Hi fg

QLab 5 video performance is definitively better than QLab 4 video performance, especially on Apple Silicon hardware. On my MacBook Pro the difference is dramatic and impossible to miss. No Apple Silicon-based Mac running QLab 5 should be showing performance problems displaying 1 megabyte PNG images.

So, if you’re experiencing something to the contrary that’s surely a sign that there is something else going on that warrants exploration. How many simultaneous cues are you running? How many video outputs are you using? What else is involved?

I encourage you to send a copy of your workspace, ideally together with a video showing the performance problem, to sup...@figure53.com so we can help you find the issue and address it.

fg

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 3:39:25 PM4/25/23
to QLab
Hi Sam,

I plugged it into my tele and did an experiment between 4/5. There was a lot more lag in the GO button in 5, but I was using a USB clicker which I've ditched now so I'll do another test

When you say video performance you mean PNG/JPG too?

Thanks

Sam Kusnetz

unread,
Apr 25, 2023, 4:54:16 PM4/25/23
to ql...@googlegroups.com
Hi fg

Yep, still images count as video! They’re just video that doesn’t change.

Any situation in which QLab 4 seems to outperform QLab 5 on an Apple Silicon Mac should be something you contact support about.

Thanks!
Sam

Sam Kusnetz (he/him) | Figure 53



--
Contact support anytime: sup...@figure53.com
Follow QLab on Twitter: https://twitter.com/QLabApp
User Group Code of Conduct: https://qlab.app/code-of-conduct/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QLab" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qlab+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qlab/12c8825e-8bfd-4fa8-a745-0a0022c3b2d4n%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages