How to select properly ac-zeta?

41 views
Skip to first unread message

Giulio Ortali

unread,
Jan 22, 2020, 10:20:27 AM1/22/20
to PyFR Mailing List
Hello everyone,
I am still running the case I was mentioning in the last 2 post on this mailing list, i.e. high reynolds (3e6) 2D incompressible flow over the ls417.

I have problems since the results, in particular the k coming out of the results, are quite different from the one computed using the RANS, almost two orders of magnitude higher.

I was thinking about the possible reasons for this and I was thinking that maybe using a ac-zeta lower than the standard 2.5 would give different results, maybe similar to the RANS. Could this be the case? What is the rationale behing the choice of zeta? I understood that lower zeta bring to "more incompressible" flows, but what are the downsides of chosing a low zeta? Also, what could be other trials to do in order to obtain k similar to the RANS?

I attach the ini file and the mesh.

Thank you in advance,
Giulio
ls417.ini
ls417.msh

Niki Loppi

unread,
Jan 23, 2020, 12:25:53 PM1/23/20
to pyfrmai...@googlegroups.com

Hi Giulio,

Thanks for your interest.

There are multiple suggestions in literature for selection of ac-zeta. I suggest using ac-zeta=3*Umax, where Umax is  approximately the maximum local velocity magnitude in the domain. Selection of ac-zeta shouldn't have big effect on the results but it can considerably affect the convergence rates.

Turbulence at high Re is highly three dimensional and hence cannot be resolved in 2D. That may be one of the reasons for the result mismatch.

Cheers,

Niki

On 22/01/20 15:20, Giulio Ortali wrote:

This email from gort...@gmail.com originates from outside Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list to disable email stamping for this address.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyfrmailingli...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pyfrmailinglist/0b45ec70-a4ff-436a-9891-9326d943e059%40googlegroups.com.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages