Request to update proto3 Specification

31 views

Skip to first unread message

unread,

Jun 10, 2021, 3:38:55 AM6/10/21

to Protocol Buffers

I've just drawn a railroad diagram for the specification and noticed a few issues.

A) Should <<enumBody>> permit <<reserved>> ?

B) Should <<fieldNumber = intLit;>> omit the trailing semicolon, to be consistent with this variety of EBNF ?

C Should syntax for <<comment>> be defined,
along with an explanation of whether comments can appear between terminal symbols ?

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages