--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Play framework dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framework-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
How big is the maintenance burden / footprint of comet in Play? If it's not very big (or can be made smaller) then just because there are other means to a similar end isn't reason to delegate it. Only if it somehow is a threat of technical debt, then you have to weigh that against the rarity of the need for it.
Also, could it be made into a separate module?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "play-framework" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to play-framewor...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/play-framework/3F581762-7DB0-4E58-A753-F6093E5D4590%40typesafe.com.
SSE is pretty much agreed comet, well IE does not agree. We used a polyfill for an internal SSE project. This can be an option for SSE, but we also added some heartbeat message on the play app.
https://github.com/Yaffle/EventSource
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/play-framework/CABW6spO%3DKXK9p7-C_3M8WTW-OL_AtRTB4y93%2B38ChZ-Attiu%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
We are still using Comet in a critical Play frontend application so its availabilty is very important for us, as legacy browsers and IE don't support more modern APIs.
Anyway thanks a lot for asking :)
Anyway thanks a lot for asking :)