So actually, sending an ICS form as a PDF attachment is not the same behavior in that Winlink Express users expect. If you use the newly developed features( not yet released) - you should see that there is a cli option --composeform in addition to --compose. What happens is that the field entries create an XML document that gets attached to the message along with the plaintext body. When received by the Winlink express user the XML field values get matched up with the html viewer / style sheet and rendered in a browser window. Moreover, the form should provided a entry field for the recipient to enter a reply in the same form progammatically.
You can probably get by in some venues/exercises by just adding a
pdf attachment, but it is not the same thing as a forms exchange.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pat-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pat-users+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/59200727-62cc-4f50-a443-cac10d0f46a6n%40googlegroups.com.
--
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/CA%2BN2qYnMNgG_ZCokiSQdGKwbt0MD3gomq3osBcuHEUTmoJo%2BNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Sending an ICS form as a pdf attachment is no different.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pat-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pat-users+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/CANk%3DMqFNZQYZ0wvb0n6bcnLp8mMw1u-6QV4KyqnWaQcFsN3M6A%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/b25c5715-b04e-4211-b6eb-650828c05f85n%40googlegroups.com.
As usual, here I come in to muddy the waters. I can definitely
see both sides of the coin. 1) forms more efficient (especially
since HF propagation can come and go). 2. In agreeing with dre ...
attachments are more flexible and accessible, at least as it
stands now.
Sending a form is really a means of compression, were all of the relevant data is extracted and transmitted. The "decoding" involves transmitting the appropriate "form code/version". This kind of process should be built into the protocol itself so that it can be implemented in any platform instead of being feature of a particular software implementation.
Off topic - but likewise for VARA.
But you know - it's just like the original email. SMTP was only
for plaintext. Then came mime and people were stuffing everything
down the pipes rather than simply forwarding a link referencing
the source for later download. So IMO forms are the way to go, but
there needs to be a uniform standard, and that speaks to the
latest comment.
Rich
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/b25c5715-b04e-4211-b6eb-650828c05f85n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/a7b2f540-02a4-fd09-8a55-08f2d13dfde1%40gmail.com.
Sure - but just so you know, I pointed the pat effort out much
earlier in the thread - so I'm 100 percent behind that. Yet - all
these ideas are relevant and this is a great discussion.

To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/55786b3f-04b6-4adc-b434-746ed5fe7c53n%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "pat-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pat-users/ntW4FTbEL2s/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to pat-users+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/5a8dd553-145c-4f54-93b8-5175087f7223n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/e0cd9e66-9758-4afd-b20d-3c7cc8cd89ben%40googlegroups.com.
Thank you for your help. The comma ended up biting me in the butt. But after I read your message about 15 times I figured out what it did wrong. Thanks again for your help
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
It seems to have been transmitted correctly when i read an copy of the message in gmail.
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 at 10:26:03 AM UTC+1 Erlend Grimseid wrote:
Realy exited about this new feature, and im trying to test it.
Refering to this message.
Where in the config should i put this line, and shold there be any },],[ or{ symbols anywhere?
On Saturday, December 19, 2020 at 5:25:33 AM UTC+1 Jim (KJ7DMV) wrote:
Thanks. the armhf package, I believe. Here we go
>> Jim Weisgram KJ7DMV
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:21 PM Chris Keller <xyl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Jim, that version is not terribly old, but there is a newer version in the beta Drive folder. The new version includes a GUI option to update Winlink forms. Give it a try!
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 9:15 PM Jim Weisgram <jimwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Correct. Yes, I wonder if I have an old version of the beta. Here is what pat version returns
Pat v0.10.0 (4265c4c) linux/arm - go1.11.6
>> Jim Weisgram KJ7DMV
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:13 PM Chris Keller <xyl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Jim,
If I understand correctly, you're able to compose a form template email from the command-line composeform option, but you're having trouble finding the forms feature from the web GUI composer, is that correct? There should be a button on the bottom of the regular compose dialog. If there's not, it's possible we handed you a testing version that didn't have the web assets updated or something like that.
--
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pat-users/CAAY2tUjsp4ca9LUqVNcj3jy2xwZzym-7pO-rOHGg0VF4mBfysg%40mail.gmail.com.