--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pac4j users mailing list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pac4j-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pac4j-users/f5b39686-2432-4e08-983c-1180a5d3d075n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pac4j-users/70782356-5060-4052-bb38-74fd1c2ffb3dn%40googlegroups.com.
| <repository> | |
| <id>sonatype-nexus-snapshots</id> | |
| <name>Sonatype Nexus Snapshots</name> | |
| <url>https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots</url> | |
| <releases> | |
| <enabled>false</enabled> | |
| </releases> | |
| <snapshots> | |
| <enabled>true</enabled> | |
| </snapshots> | |
| </repository> |
Hi,
The pac4j-cas 5.5.0 has actual compile dependencies with org.jasig.cas.client that are not optional
BUT,
There is also a new artifact org.apereo.cas.client that jumped to jakarta namespace
https://github.com/apereo/java-cas-client and it is mavened in repository
Considering these two conflicting artifacts, it seems to me, according to the compile dependencies, that pac4j-cas and an other pac4j-cas-jakarta should coexist.
But i may be wrong…
Being jakarta namespaces user, i can not use current pac4j-cas at this stage.
Many thanks , once again, for your time and reactivity
Cordialement,
Nicolas GAUDIN
Directeur R&D iVision
244 route de Seysses Hall IV ‑ 1er étage
31100
Toulouse
Début du message transféré :De: Jérôme LELEU <lel...@gmail.com>
Date: 14 septembre 2022 à 11:04:29 UTC+2
Cc: Pac4j users mailing list <pac4j...@googlegroups.com>
Objet: Rép. : SAML & CAS Jakarta compliancy + SNAKEYAML CVE
Hi,
I agree with you.
Let me describe it further to get the full view
We are in the process of checking all libraries that still have javax dependencies.. and in some case might cause issues..
Of course using exclusions in our pom and checking all is working properly is one option…but what if (not speaking of pac4j specifically, but other librairies perhaps), we use some features of a library that effectively need javax (via indirect use). We do not want to have to import these javax dependencies (remove exclusions).
So in this context and if possible, we try to optimize our dependency management to those libraries fully jakarta compatible.
(We also check libraries for potential CVEs)
Sure, I will ask to test 5.6.0-snapshot and we will get back to you asap.
Many thanks for the modifications you made. I think, you might agree, that it is a good thing at the end.
One last question : when do you plan to deliver 5.6.0 release ?
Best regards,
Cordialement,
Nicolas GAUDIN
Directeur R&D iVision
244 route de Seysses Hall IV ‑ 1er étage
31100
Toulouse
De : Jérôme LELEU <lel...@gmail.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 15 septembre 2022 08:09
À : Nicolas GAUDIN <n.ga...@everwin.fr>
Cc : pac4j...@googlegroups.com; Fabien DASTE <f.d...@everwin.fr>
Objet : Re: SAML & CAS Jakarta compliancy + SNAKEYAML CVE
Hi Jérôme,
Still on progress, we are full booked…sorry about that.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pac4j-users/8daf8560-2616-44a7-8476-8f831f6e91d4n%40googlegroups.com.