Hi Erik,
A single boundary still implies continuous deposition. I’d use two P_sequences each with their own boundaries for the two sections of the core, and place them within a Sequence so that they are constrained to follow one another. Modelled like this, the two P_sequences have independent deposition regimes, so do not learn from one another about the k value. This is a disadvantage if you think the deposition process was the same before and after the unconformity. You might also consider two boundaries in your P_sequence separated by a Gap with a suitable prior.
Best wishes
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew Millard
Associate Professor of Archaeology, and
Designated Individual under the Human Tissue Act,
Durham University, UK
Email: A.R.M...@durham.ac.uk
Personal page: https://www.dur.ac.uk/directory/profile/?id=160
Scottish Soldiers Project: https://www.dur.ac.uk/scottishsoldiers
Dunbar 1650 MOOC: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/battle-of-dunbar-1650
From: ox...@googlegroups.com <ox...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Erik Marsh
Sent: 02 February 2021 01:56
To: OxCal <ox...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: how to model an unconformity in a lake core?
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OxCal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
oxcal+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oxcal/02db36be-4f74-405a-84f2-8cbc7bc70d05n%40googlegroups.com.
Plot()
{
Curve("IntCal20","IntCal20.14c");
Curve("SHCal20","SHCal20.14c");
Mix_Curve("Mixed","IntCal20","SHCal20",U(0,100));
Sequence()
{
P_Sequence("Below unconformity",1,0.7,U(-2,2))
{
Boundary("Bottom of core");
R_Date("UCI-164754",4285,40) { z=287; };
R_Date("UCI-224579",3370,220) { z=261.5; };
R_Date("UCI-209788",3670,60) { z=257.5; };
R_Date("UCI-224585",3020,150) { z=252.5; };
R_Date("UCI-164753",2620,30) { z=228.5; };
R_Date("UCI-172624",2300,20) { z=195; };
R_Date("UCI-224578",2250,100) { z=183; };
R_Date("UCI-224584",1780,180) { z=157.5; };
R_Date("UCI-164752",1655,30) { z=142.5; };
Boundary("117 cm") { z=117; };
};
// All four outliers fall in this section of the core
// R_Date("UCI-209787",2275,20) {z=142.5; };
// R_Date("UCI-172623",2850,15) {z=124.5;};
// R_Date("UCI-224583",1530,110) {z=121; };
// R_Date("UCI-224582",1640,240) {z=118; };
P_Sequence("Above unconformity",1,1,U(-2,2))
{
Boundary("116 cm") {z=116; };
R_Date("UCI-224581",760,180) { z=103; };
R_Date("UCI-224580",970,160) { z=100; };
R_Date("UCI-224577",470,170) { z=92.5; };
R_Date("UCI-224576",420,270) { z=78.5; };
R_Date("UCI-224575",460,170) { z=62; };
R_Date("UCI-172622",420,30) { z=47.5; };
Curve("Bomb13SH12","bomb13sh12.14c");
R_Date("UCI-172621",-30,15) { z=25; };
Boundary("Top of core");
};
};
};