Quick answer:
- If what you want is something that looks like an adjusted total: Q-Points for Open, Q-Youth for under 20, Q-Masters for Masters.
- Q-Youth should be split in at least two awards -- because comparing 13 year olds to 17 year olds is not the same "youth"
- SMHF is no longer used by IMWA or UWMF
Looking ahead.
- IWF is in the process of approving a different type of score called GAMX that has a much broader and sounder statistical basis, AND is comparable between men and women
- In other words, if your GAMX is better than someone else's you are a better athlete relative to the world "top people" that are used as reference.
- In GAMX, an outlier can actually be "above" the "top people" reference and not skew everything like what happens with Sinclair
- GAMX are comparable between men and women. You could have team competitions with 2 men 4 women in team A and the opposite in team B and just add the GAMX
- There are several GAMX other than the one IWF is leaning towards using. There are GAMX for youth (considering age and bodyweight), and for Masters, and one for the
general athletes (based on the long-running USAW Opens) as opposed to world elites. For the WSO championships you would be using this latter one.
OWLCMS version 64 supports all of them.