--Tjarko Tjaden, M.Sc.
Hi Tjarko, all
The wikipedia entry for open energy
system models has a section on components (in contrast to fully
fledged modeling frameworks, that is):
I am about to add pvlib and hplib. If there are other components out there that should be included, please reply either on‑list of off‑llst.
Also, I would like to endorse the
concept of providing well developed and tested technical
characterizations that can be used as building blocks in other
projects.
with best wishes, Robbie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "openmod initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openmod-initiat...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openmod-initiative/24838ede72baad9d2e7b779b86543207296a2899.camel%40gmail.com.
-- Robbie Morrison Address: Schillerstrasse 85, 10627 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49.30.612-87617
Hi Tjarko
I just added brief entries for pvlib and hplib to wikipedia and also tweaked the subsection name and section lead‑in text:
My earlier comment on "technical characterizations" as "building
blocks" was a reference to the various technology modules listed
(yours included). These fall under the general idea of
programming components, more formally known as component-based
software engineering (CBSE). Also the so‑called "separation
of concerns" (SoC) paradigm is a key informing principle for CBSE,
but implicit here in that most modelers can (I hope) distinguish
between PV installations, heat pumps, and battery storage!
Moreover, the development of say just a couple of broadly
encompassing technology modules for each technology should serve
the needs of most energy system modeling frameworks. They may need
to be reimplemented in the chosen language (say ported from python
to julia). But these modules should nonetheless free up modeling
projects to concentrate on system analysis and exploring the
solution and non‑solution space (that last remark is to suggest
that identifying infeasible proposals may be as valuable
policy‑wise as identifying feasible proposals).
Finally, I guess that pvlib built on the earlier Sandia photovoltaic array performance model (also listed on wikipedia), given the author affiliations on pvlib?
with best wishes, Robbie
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openmod-initiative/a6b4a616-397f-433b-b685-e5e12d36a66fn%40googlegroups.com.