Re: [opencog/opencog] General cleanup of the embodiment doc. (#2488)

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Linas Vepstas

unread,
Nov 20, 2016, 4:31:24 AM11/20/16
to opencog, hansonr...@googlegroups.com
Atttached please find the latest version of the latest draft of the embodiment-world-model document. It cleans up almost all remaining loose text.  It's still missing a conclusion, and probably still needs more grooming, but it should be a quasi-final draft.

I did want to expound further on how to design certain subsystems, but then decided it was wiser to prototype first, and describe those results, than to speculate first, and not be understood.  Thus, speculation is minimal, and the doc does not try to be forward-looking beyond the next step or two.

Chapter 6 is filled with a bullet-point list of "neat ideas" that should be very straight-forward to implement in the current framework, that I hope "any" programmer could accomplish.  My hopes have been dashed before, but hope springs eternal.

--linas 

 

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Ben Goertzel <b...@goertzel.org> wrote:
Can you send out a PDF please?  (I use LaTeX regularly but don't feel like messing with Lyx ...)

thx!


On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Linas Vepštas <notifi...@github.com> wrote:

Merged #2488.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.




--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“I tell my students, when you go to these meetings, see what direction everyone is headed, so you can go in the opposite direction. Don’t polish the brass on the bandwagon.” – V. S. Ramachandran

embodiment-0.2.pdf

Apil Tamang

unread,
Nov 20, 2016, 11:35:18 AM11/20/16
to opencog, hansonr...@googlegroups.com, linasv...@gmail.com
Hi All,
Trying to read through the knowledge.scm file that is supposed to, in some ways, embody the internal-model for chatbot-eva.

Naturally, I have some very basic questions. It'd be nice to understand what exactly the following nodes do or represent:

- DefinedSchema, 
- Inheritance vs. InheritanceLink, 
- AnchorNode, and 
- PredicateNode vs. DefinedPredicate vs. Predicate)

I've come across the few others (EvaluationLink, Predicate etc) while reading through the PLN book, where the exposition is much more detailed. I can implicitly guess what each of the above represents, but it'd help to know the nuances between (for e.g.) Inheritance Vs InheritanceLink (etc.) as well as fundamental basis for nodes like the 'DefinedSchema'.

Also, where'd be a good source to read more about these nodes ?

Ed Pell

unread,
Nov 20, 2016, 9:29:27 PM11/20/16
to opencog, hansonr...@googlegroups.com, linasv...@gmail.com
Linas, wonderful step forward. It is so pleasing to see the small surgical team ahead of the massive corporate armies. Keep running the wolf packs will get organized eventually. The more you put in the public domain the less they can enclose and control.

Ed

 

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 4:31:24 AM UTC-5, linas wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages