Criticism of pure patternism and of PLN

[Eugene Gr. Philippov]

R.Kurzweil and B.Goertzel write about a patternist point of view to the Universe.

I would like to write about multiparadigm and metaparadigm map of the Universe and non-dual (in K.Wilber's and advaita's sense) territory of the Universe. This is much wider than pure patternism. Patternism is a single paradigm, and therefore OpenCog AtomSpace has a model not complete enough, not expressive enough.

In the Model of hierarchical complexity[1] (M.L.Commons) patternism of OpenCog as a system with two variables (probability and value of trust) has complexity of 12 (systematic complexity level). 

With metaparadigmatic and multiparadigmatic approach, the complexity level would be 16 and 15, correspondigly.

As one example, (probability and value of trust) pair could be replaced by an object of unrestricted type, with values to be interpreted by MindAgents. This would allow for a better expressiveness.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_of_hierarchical_complexity

WBR,

Eugene Gr. Philippov

[holala...@gmail.com]

nondual is the public word, but is quite vague.. see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_set#Extensions

bipolar fuzzy sets papers:
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/do/search/?q=author_lname%3A%22Zhang%22%20author_fname%3A%22Wen-Ran%22&start=0&context=3893890&facet=