I don’t think we can say much about what’s going on here, there are way too many variables. I suggest you go back to using your 400mm refractor where you have a reasonable guider image scale. Decide on what mount connection you want to use – presumably CPWI – and stay with it. Then carefully run a series of tests according to this plan:
Don’t run NINA, don’t try to do any imaging, just work with PHD2 to figure out what’s going wrong with your setup. One thing you should definitely check is the tightness and rigidity of the guiding assembly – all the mechanical attachments between the guide camera and the main telescope. Also be sure you don’t have hanging or dragging cables. From what little I could see from your logs, it looks like you’re getting unwanted movement in this area, events not attributable to either guiding or basic mount tracking.
Good luck,
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open PHD Guiding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-phd-guidi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/e9f4624c-6e10-424b-9a6a-15db1f66d959n%40googlegroups.com.
You can’t keep changing variables if you want to get to a stable configuration. If the scope is on a wedge, it should be capable of guiding in both RA and Dec. Follow the procedures I sent you and we should be able to determine what the mount is capable of doing and where it’s shortcomings are. For example, the Guiding Assistant will show what the mount is doing with no guiding being done at all, including Dec. You can’t try to just jump to a solution, you have to understand the problem first.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-phd-guiding/555010cc-5cb0-4983-942f-a9b90e03e6d9n%40googlegroups.com.