[PATCH] iscsi: Fix deadlock on recovery path during GFP_IO reclaim

34 views
Skip to first unread message

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

unread,
May 8, 2020, 2:00:03 AM5/8/20
to ldu...@suse.com, cle...@redhat.com, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted via
the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
rx_queue_mutex, if that allocation causes a memory reclaim that
writebacks to a failed iscsi device. Then, the recovery procedure can
never make progress to recover the failed disk or abort outstanding IO
operations to complete the reclaim (since rx_queue_mutex is locked),
thus locking the system.

Nevertheless, just marking all allocations under rx_queue_mutex as
GFP_NOIO (or locking the userspace process with something like
PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) is not enough, since the iscsi command code relies on
other subsystems that try to grab locked mutexes, whose threads are
GFP_IO, leading to the same deadlock. One instance where this situation
can be observed is in the backtraces below, stitched from multiple bugs
reports, involving the kobj uevent sent when a session is created.

The root of the problem is not the fact that iscsi does GFP_IO
allocations, that is acceptable. The actual problem is that
rx_queue_mutex has a very large granularity, covering every unrelated
netlink command execution at the same time as the error recovery path.

The proposed fix leverages the recently added mechanism to stop failed
connections from the kernel, by enabling it to execute even though a
management command from the netlink socket is being run (rx_queue_mutex
is held), provided that the command is known to be safe. It splits the
rx_queue_mutex in two mutexes, one protecting from concurrent command
execution from the netlink socket, and one protecting stop_conn from
racing with other connection management operations that might conflict
with it.

It is not very pretty, but it is the simplest way to resolve the
deadlock. I considered making it a lock per connection, but some
external mutex would still be needed to deal with iscsi_if_destroy_conn.

The patch was tested by forcing a memory shrinker (unrelated, but used
bufio/dm-verity) to reclaim ISCSI pages every time
ISCSI_UEVENT_CREATE_SESSION happens, which is reasonable to simulate
reclaims that might happen with GFP_KERNEL on that path. Then, a faulty
hung target causes a connection to fail during intensive IO, at the same
time a new session is added by iscsid.

The following stacktraces are stiches from several bug reports, showing
a case where the deadlock can happen.

iSCSI-write
holding: rx_queue_mutex
waiting: uevent_sock_mutex

kobject_uevent_env+0x1bd/0x419
kobject_uevent+0xb/0xd
device_add+0x48a/0x678
scsi_add_host_with_dma+0xc5/0x22d
iscsi_host_add+0x53/0x55
iscsi_sw_tcp_session_create+0xa6/0x129
iscsi_if_rx+0x100/0x1247
netlink_unicast+0x213/0x4f0
netlink_sendmsg+0x230/0x3c0

iscsi_fail iscsi_conn_failure
waiting: rx_queue_mutex

schedule_preempt_disabled+0x325/0x734
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x18b/0x230
mutex_lock+0x22/0x40
iscsi_conn_failure+0x42/0x149
worker_thread+0x24a/0xbc0

EventManager_
holding: uevent_sock_mutex
waiting: dm_bufio_client->lock

dm_bufio_lock+0xe/0x10
shrink+0x34/0xf7
shrink_slab+0x177/0x5d0
do_try_to_free_pages+0x129/0x470
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0x14f/0x210
memcg_kmem_newpage_charge+0xa6d/0x13b0
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4a3/0x1a70
fallback_alloc+0x1b2/0x36c
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xb9/0x10d0
__alloc_skb+0x83/0x2f0
kobject_uevent_env+0x26b/0x419
dm_kobject_uevent+0x70/0x79
dev_suspend+0x1a9/0x1e7
ctl_ioctl+0x3e9/0x411
dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x17
do_vfs_ioctl+0xb3/0x460
SyS_ioctl+0x5e/0x90

MemcgReclaimerD"
holding: dm_bufio_client->lock
waiting: stuck io to finish (needs iscsi_fail thread to progress)

schedule at ffffffffbd603618
io_schedule at ffffffffbd603ba4
do_io_schedule at ffffffffbdaf0d94
__wait_on_bit at ffffffffbd6008a6
out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffffbd600960
wait_on_bit.constprop.10 at ffffffffbdaf0f17
__make_buffer_clean at ffffffffbdaf18ba
__cleanup_old_buffer at ffffffffbdaf192f
shrink at ffffffffbdaf19fd
do_shrink_slab at ffffffffbd6ec000
shrink_slab at ffffffffbd6ec24a
do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffffbd6eda09
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages at ffffffffbd6ede7e
mem_cgroup_resize_limit at ffffffffbd7024c0
mem_cgroup_write at ffffffffbd703149
cgroup_file_write at ffffffffbd6d9c6e
sys_write at ffffffffbd6662ea
system_call_fastpath at ffffffffbdbc34a2

Reported-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <kha...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kri...@collabora.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
index 17a45716a0fe..d99c17306dff 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
@@ -1616,6 +1616,12 @@ static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(iscsi_connection_class,
static struct sock *nls;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rx_queue_mutex);

+/*
+ * conn_mutex protects the {start,bind,stop,destroy}_conn from racing
+ * against the kernel stop_connection recovery mechanism
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(conn_mutex);
+
static LIST_HEAD(sesslist);
static LIST_HEAD(sessdestroylist);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sesslock);
@@ -2442,6 +2448,32 @@ int iscsi_offload_mesg(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_offload_mesg);

+/*
+ * This can be called without the rx_queue_mutex, if invoked by the kernel
+ * stop work. But, in that case, it is guaranteed not to race with
+ * iscsi_destroy by conn_mutex.
+ */
+static void iscsi_if_stop_conn(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, int flag)
+{
+ /*
+ * It is important that this path doesn't rely on
+ * rx_queue_mutex, otherwise, a thread doing allocation on a
+ * start_session/start_connection could sleep waiting on a
+ * writeback to a failed iscsi device, that cannot be recovered
+ * because the lock is held. If we don't hold it here, the
+ * kernel stop_conn_work_fn has a chance to stop the broken
+ * session and resolve the allocation.
+ *
+ * Still, the user invoked .stop_conn() needs to be serialized
+ * with stop_conn_work_fn by a private mutex. Not pretty, but
+ * it works.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
+ conn->transport->stop_conn(conn, flag);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+
+}
+
static void stop_conn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, *tmp;
@@ -2460,30 +2492,17 @@ static void stop_conn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
uint32_t sid = iscsi_conn_get_sid(conn);
struct iscsi_cls_session *session;

- mutex_lock(&rx_queue_mutex);
-
session = iscsi_session_lookup(sid);
if (session) {
if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
session->recovery_tmo = 0;
- conn->transport->stop_conn(conn,
- STOP_CONN_TERM);
+ iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, STOP_CONN_TERM);
} else {
- conn->transport->stop_conn(conn,
- STOP_CONN_RECOVER);
+ iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, STOP_CONN_RECOVER);
}
}

list_del_init(&conn->conn_list_err);
-
- mutex_unlock(&rx_queue_mutex);
-
- /* we don't want to hold rx_queue_mutex for too long,
- * for instance if many conns failed at the same time,
- * since this stall other iscsi maintenance operations.
- * Give other users a chance to proceed.
- */
- cond_resched();
}
}

@@ -2843,8 +2862,11 @@ iscsi_if_destroy_conn(struct iscsi_transport *transport, struct iscsi_uevent *ev
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&connlock, flags);

ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "Destroying transport conn\n");
+
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
if (transport->destroy_conn)
transport->destroy_conn(conn);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);

return 0;
}
@@ -3686,9 +3708,12 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
break;
}

+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->bind_conn(session, conn,
ev->u.b_conn.transport_eph,
ev->u.b_conn.is_leading);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+
if (ev->r.retcode || !transport->ep_connect)
break;

@@ -3709,25 +3734,31 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
break;
case ISCSI_UEVENT_START_CONN:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.start_conn.sid, ev->u.start_conn.cid);
- if (conn)
+ if (conn) {
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->start_conn(conn);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+ }
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
case ISCSI_UEVENT_STOP_CONN:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.stop_conn.sid, ev->u.stop_conn.cid);
if (conn)
- transport->stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
+ iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
case ISCSI_UEVENT_SEND_PDU:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.send_pdu.sid, ev->u.send_pdu.cid);
- if (conn)
+ if (conn) {
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->send_pdu(conn,
(struct iscsi_hdr*)((char*)ev + sizeof(*ev)),
(char*)ev + sizeof(*ev) + ev->u.send_pdu.hdr_size,
ev->u.send_pdu.data_size);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+ }
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
--
2.26.2

Martin K. Petersen

unread,
May 14, 2020, 8:11:31 PM5/14/20
to ldu...@suse.com, cle...@redhat.com, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov

Lee/Chris: Please review!
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Lee Duncan

unread,
May 17, 2020, 1:32:10 PM5/17/20
to Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, cle...@redhat.com, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
I'm curious about why you removed the cond_resched() here. Is it because
it is no longer needed, with shorter (mutex) waiting time?
My question above is for my own information, so I'll still say:

Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <ldu...@suse.com>

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

unread,
May 18, 2020, 2:53:16 PM5/18/20
to Lee Duncan, cle...@redhat.com, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
Hi Lee,

My thought was that the main reason for cond_resched here was to give a
chance for other iscsi maintenance operations to run. But, since
conn_mutex, differently from rx_queue_mutex, won't stop most of the
operations, it felt unnecessary. If you disagree, I can submit a v2
that doesn't change it.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Lee Duncan

unread,
May 18, 2020, 3:06:34 PM5/18/20
to Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, cle...@redhat.com, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
As far as I know, use of cond_resched() seems semi-random. I suspected
your answer would be what you said. I'm fine with that. If we see iscsi
transmit threads start to hog CPU time we can always revisit this choice.

Martin K. Petersen

unread,
May 19, 2020, 9:12:43 PM5/19/20
to Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, ldu...@suse.com, cle...@redhat.com, martin....@oracle.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov

Gabriel,

> iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted
> via the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
> rx_queue_mutex,

This does not apply to 5.8/scsi-queue. Please resubmit.

Thanks!

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

unread,
May 19, 2020, 9:37:51 PM5/19/20
to Martin K. Petersen, ldu...@suse.com, cle...@redhat.com, open-...@googlegroups.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin....@oracle.com> writes:

> Gabriel,
>
>> iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted
>> via the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
>> rx_queue_mutex,
>
> This does not apply to 5.8/scsi-queue. Please resubmit.

Hi Martin,

Apparently it conflicted with my own code coming from -next. Sorry. I
will resubmit as soon as I finish testing it.

--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

unread,
May 19, 2020, 10:30:11 PM5/19/20
to martin....@oracle.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, open-...@googlegroups.com, ldu...@suse.com, cle...@redhat.com, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, ker...@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov
iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted via
the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <ldu...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kri...@collabora.com>

Changes since v1:
- Rebase to v5.8/scsi-queue
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
index b2a803c51288..ea6d498fa923 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
@@ -1616,6 +1616,12 @@ static DECLARE_TRANSPORT_CLASS(iscsi_connection_class,
static struct sock *nls;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rx_queue_mutex);

+/*
+ * conn_mutex protects the {start,bind,stop,destroy}_conn from racing
+ * against the kernel stop_connection recovery mechanism
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(conn_mutex);
+
static LIST_HEAD(sesslist);
static LIST_HEAD(sessdestroylist);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sesslock);
@@ -2445,6 +2451,32 @@ int iscsi_offload_mesg(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
@@ -2463,30 +2495,17 @@ static void stop_conn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -2846,8 +2865,11 @@ iscsi_if_destroy_conn(struct iscsi_transport *transport, struct iscsi_uevent *ev
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&connlock, flags);

ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "Destroying transport conn\n");
+
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
if (transport->destroy_conn)
transport->destroy_conn(conn);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);

return 0;
}
@@ -3689,9 +3711,12 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
break;
}

+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->bind_conn(session, conn,
ev->u.b_conn.transport_eph,
ev->u.b_conn.is_leading);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+
if (ev->r.retcode || !transport->ep_connect)
break;

@@ -3713,9 +3738,11 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
case ISCSI_UEVENT_START_CONN:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.start_conn.sid, ev->u.start_conn.cid);
if (conn) {
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->start_conn(conn);
if (!ev->r.retcode)
conn->state = ISCSI_CONN_UP;
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
}
else
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -3723,17 +3750,20 @@ iscsi_if_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, uint32_t *group)
case ISCSI_UEVENT_STOP_CONN:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.stop_conn.sid, ev->u.stop_conn.cid);
if (conn)
- transport->stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
+ iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, ev->u.stop_conn.flag);
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
case ISCSI_UEVENT_SEND_PDU:
conn = iscsi_conn_lookup(ev->u.send_pdu.sid, ev->u.send_pdu.cid);
- if (conn)
+ if (conn) {
+ mutex_lock(&conn_mutex);
ev->r.retcode = transport->send_pdu(conn,
(struct iscsi_hdr*)((char*)ev + sizeof(*ev)),
(char*)ev + sizeof(*ev) + ev->u.send_pdu.hdr_size,
ev->u.send_pdu.data_size);
+ mutex_unlock(&conn_mutex);
+ }
else
err = -EINVAL;
break;
--
2.26.2

Martin K. Petersen

unread,
May 26, 2020, 10:13:21 PM5/26/20
to Gabriel Krisman Bertazi, Martin K . Petersen, linux...@vger.kernel.org, open-...@googlegroups.com, Khazhismel Kumykov, cle...@redhat.com, ldu...@suse.com, ker...@collabora.com
On Tue, 19 May 2020 22:29:59 -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:

> iscsi suffers from a deadlock in case a management command submitted via
> the netlink socket sleeps on an allocation while holding the
> rx_queue_mutex, if that allocation causes a memory reclaim that
> writebacks to a failed iscsi device. Then, the recovery procedure can
> never make progress to recover the failed disk or abort outstanding IO
> operations to complete the reclaim (since rx_queue_mutex is locked),
> thus locking the system.
>
> [...]

Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: iscsi: Fix deadlock on recovery path during GFP_IO reclaim
https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/7e7cd796f277

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

unread,
May 26, 2020, 10:23:20 PM5/26/20
to Martin K. Petersen, linux...@vger.kernel.org, open-...@googlegroups.com, Khazhismel Kumykov, cle...@redhat.com, ldu...@suse.com, ker...@collabora.com
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin....@oracle.com> writes:

Thanks, Martin!

--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages