Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 2 topics

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Dec 10, 2025, 11:58:18 AM12/10/25
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear All, 

Most of the scientists on ResearchGate and elsewhere are allergic to invoking the name of Creator. To clarify my position I would like to inform you all how and why I invoke the name of the Creator in my comments.
I was a happy go lucky person enjoying my job as Director of the organisation having three thousand employees. An incident happened in 2005 due to which I got interested in theology. Since I had the physics background I realised that under Big Bang paradigm there could be no God. I read philosophy, reread physics and did the philosophical research. My research conclusively revealed that Big Bang paradigm is utter nonsense. The space has been shown to be filled up with aether then how come Big Bang paradigm is adopted in physics. Then I published scientific research papers which prove that Big Bang paradigm is utter nonsense yet adopted by mainstream physicists. With aether filling the space and nonuniformity of CMBR there is not an iota of doubt that Big Bang paradigm is utter nonsense. I have taken a vow that I will make mainstream physicists discard Big Bang theory and I will see to it that this is done sooner. 

With Regards 
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a Philanthropist. 

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 09 03:45PM

Hi Bob Gray,
You asked a great question about 58 minutes into last Saturday's Science chat. Unfortunately, I couldn't do justice to it due to technical issues with my connection.
 ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 09 01:10PM -0700

Akinbo and Bob,
 
I have attached a couple of my favorite views of dynamic electromagnetic
wave propagations.
The "Electromagnetic wave" image is shown in both an animated dynamic .gif ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 09 09:30PM -0800

Cornelis,
 
But we do measure a current from a meter if you just hang one end in the air and the other end in the ground - fact
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
On Dec 7, 2025, at 10:27 PM, Cornelis Verhey ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 09 09:33PM -0800

Actually since it is the neutral dipole that oscillates, we would expect 0 net magnetic field generation in this case.
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
 ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 10 08:54AM

Cornelis, et.al.,
 
Yes, the picture and animations are useful and look like those in the Wikipedia page that I sent earlier. Also, like I mentioned Ron Hatch also envisioned a kind of helical model ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 10 09:55AM

Franklin,
 
I made a mistake. The first sentence should have read:
 
This response is your way of having to obey Ampère’s law, but you don’t mind being in the bad books for Faraday’s law.
 ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 10 10:26AM

Hi All,
 
I think what I am looking for is in Ron Hatch’s book, ‘Escape from Einstein’, from about page 44...
 
(excerpts)
 
The New Ether Gauge Theory
 
Defining the Ether
 ...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Dec 09 08:24PM +0100

The Lorentz transform states that transverse ether wind reduces light speed
according to the Lorentz factor.
In conflict with the wave model stating that an ether wind inside the wave ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.

John-Erik Persson

unread,
Dec 10, 2025, 7:20:03 PM12/10/25
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear Shafic Kahn and all

You are right Shafic, Big Bang is nonsense. But you need to explain the cosmic red shift without that nonsense. We must also explain gravity.
A material body absorbs ether particles, and reduces the ether flow away from this body, A. This creates a net flow of ether particles in direction against A, and symmetric around A. This flow is not symmetric in body B, and this asymmetry inside B is directed against A, and therefore causes a force inside B directed against A. So, gravity emerges inside matter.
We can conclude that gravity is emergent and no force is moving between A and B.
So, a net flow in direction against A causes the large red shift.
  • We have a falling ether that can be very large and only red. 
  • We have planetary motions that are very small and can be both red and blue.
  • This explains why we can observe large red shifts but only small blue shifts.
  • WE DO NOT NEED BIG BANG
John-Erik
See the links
DS



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz3_nb10LnW5PZnh66P59LpY-LU7jqPWdS%2Bvmi9rEsENAA%40mail.gmail.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages