Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Shafiq Khan
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 06:07PM
Hi Carl,
Let me add a Lesson from Scenario 1, which I tried to establish in a past discussion with Stephan concerning relative motion. With the CMBR lights switched off, there will be no motion ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 07:10PM
Hi Joe, Apart from the fact that it was contraption physics, the counterintuitive scenarios were interesting nevertheless.
But as regards that basic circular motion ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 04 12:39PM -0700
Akinbo and all,
This does not demonstrates an absolute reference frame. It only
demonstrates that the CMB as an identifiable energy pattern in space-time
can be chosen as unique reference frame. ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 07:48PM
Hi David, Joe, et.al.,
Indeed, if I recall, it was by using calculus to find the amount of force required to deviate the moon by an infinitesimal amount from its straight line tangential path till ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 07:49PM
Cornelis,
What is your precise definition of an absolute reference frame?
Akinbo
________________________________
From: Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 4, ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 04 02:08PM -0700
In *red* below from my previous email response to your inquiry.
You seem to not accept the definition without further explanation so I left
it at that.
From: *Cornelis Verhey* ...more
Joe Sorge <joe....@decisivedx.com>: Sep 05 12:46AM
Hi David,
I agree. Very good point.
Thank you,
Joe
From: David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 3:07 AM
To: Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>, Franklin Hu ...more
Joe Sorge <joe....@decisivedx.com>: Sep 05 12:51AM
Thank you,
Joe
From: David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 12:10 PM
To: Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>, Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>, Joe Sorge ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 09:47PM -0400
Akinbo?
What are you talking about?
Orbital decay happens because the satellites still encounter some gas and frictional losses occur. This has nothing to do with anything the medium is doing. ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 10:25PM -0400
Aj,
How can something be quantized if it isn't made of separate particles?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2025, at 11:37 PM, AJ <andre...@gmail.com> wrote:
A quantized ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 10:27PM -0400
David,
Then how do propose that your medium distinguish between a high tension and a low one. I know how this is easily accomplished in real particulate mediums, but you don't get to use that ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 10:46PM -0400
The magnetic force is clearly velocity dependent. What is Wong with the explanation I have provided which is that force is linearly dependent upon the number of dipoles cut per unit time which ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 08:17AM +0530
All,
The ether force balances between every planet, star and the galaxies.
Orbital motion.
I have sent this peer reviewed paper of mine several times to this group.
It is as simple as this - ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 12:42AM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
[Snipped.]
Very thoughtful. I will insert my replies in-line and in red.
On 9/4/2025 4:37 AM, Akinbo Ojo wrote:
Hi Carl, et.al.,
When you deeply contemplate the four ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 12:43AM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
Same red in-lining as my previous message.
On 9/4/2025 4:56 AM, Akinbo Ojo wrote:
...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 12:45AM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
More of the same (in red).
On 9/4/2025 11:07 AM, Akinbo Ojo wrote:
...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 12:46AM -0700
Hi David,
[Snipped.]
I am going to ask this inquisitively, not argumentatively. You final
sentence says, "If gravity were to be switched off, the centrifugal
force would remain and the body ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 05 09:49AM
Cornelis,
Absolute can have several meanings in English. Within the context of what is being discussed, “absolute” means a motionless standard of reference. This is contrast to other references ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 05 10:19AM
Franklin,
If you still stand by this, “The simple answer is that in order for a particle to go into a circular path, it has to be CONSTANTLY pushed with a force to make it go that path. ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 05 10:51AM
Hi Carl,
Re: “Did you mean to say, indistinguishable?”
No. I meant distinguishable. According to Sir Isaac, using several arguments and thought experiments, but working in darkness since ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 05 11:14AM
Hi Carl,
Re: “(I don't even know what those two underlined parts mean.)”
Yes, I agree that the meaning may not be clear as long as it is not recognized that circular motion ALWAYS requires ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 05 11:47AM
Hi Carl, If there is neither a centripetal force nor a central force involved, then centrifugal force will not make itself known physically. It becomes a purely observational thing. ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 08:44AM -0400
ALL,
*The Ether mass acceleration = gravity, g balances forces between planets
and stars.*
[image: image.png]
F V Fernandes
*On.Target Molecules Biotech Inc*
Website: O.TM Biotech Inc. ...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 01:31PM +0200
Regarding MMX:
- No effect in the transverse arm (wave model)
- No *observable* effect in longitudinal arm (MMX)
- Contraction of 2-way light
- Contraction of light is compensated ...more
Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com>: Sep 04 10:49PM +0530
Hi Mr. Anderton,
I have shown that Einstein had done 1+1=3 whereas I have shown 1+1=2. It is
as simple as that but this premise is on cosmic level that is why it could
not be pointed out before. ...more
Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com>: Sep 04 11:25PM +0530
Hi Mr. Anderton,
Good to know that you have got my and your vision compared by unbiased AI.
Our perspectives match so far as theories of relativity and invalidity of
Lorentz factor are concerned. ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 05 11:43AM +0100
Hi Shafiq
Have you ever done a Saturday talk for John Chappell Natural Philosophy
society? We could do one if you like.
see
https://www.youtube.com/@JohnChappell/streams ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
John-Erik Persson
- Special relativity is built on the Lorentz transform
- The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
- So, special relativity is in conflict with the wave model
- Special relativity is wrong
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz0mX3Dxk9%2B%2BysJgNihDaQ90uyR%2B2W0YPEH9aKrGx4hMqg%40mail.gmail.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
>>The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model<<<
AI says - the Lorentz transform is not in conflict with the wave model if one accepts Einstein’s postulates of special relativity—but it is in conflict with the older, mechanical ether-wave picture.
SO, maybe you are thinking of the older mechanical ether-wave model??
------ Original Message ------
From: joer...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 5th 2025, 20:25
Subject: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Shafiq
- Special relativity is built on the Lorentz transform
- The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
- So, special relativity is in conflict with the wave model
- Special relativity is wrong
John-Erik
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 7:27 PM Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz0mX3Dxk9%2B%2BysJgNihDaQ90uyR%2B2W0YPEH9aKrGx4hMqg%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAECQJUCFAzttht_gkfGzKEQz%2Bsq98f%3D4Ouz28J7skuueCJWcrQ%40mail.gmail.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
Hi Shafiq
If you have powerpoint you could write the slides in powerpoint, and I could present just that.
Regards
Roger
------ Original Message ------
From: shaf...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 5th 2025, 18:28
Subject: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Hi Anderton
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
John-Erik Persson
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/4fb3fadd.8ccd.1991bce26eb.Webtop.48%40btinternet.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
didn't
talking instead about Lorentz transforms in Einstein context
------ Original Message ------
From: joer...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 6th 2025, 01:02
Subject: Re: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Roger
To use Einstein to justify Lorentz is to reason in the wrong direction.
John-Erik
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/4fb3fadd.8ccd.1991bce26eb.Webtop.48%40btinternet.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAECQJUBm8%2B95nLRDCuUekNtt6sOPuHjZfTpMq3MOYRF4fHxfpg%40mail.gmail.com.
John-Erik Persson
- The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
- Einstein's theory is based on Lorentz' mistake
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/7c8971eb.8d73.1991dcdfdb3.Webtop.155%40btinternet.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
I pointed out you must be talking about the older model (?)
------ Original Message ------
From: joer...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 6th 2025, 14:36
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Roger
- The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
- Einstein's theory is based on Lorentz' mistake
John-Erik
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/7c8971eb.8d73.1991dcdfdb3.Webtop.155%40btinternet.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAECQJUBXizQK2JZTKRHmdnD0pkKt%3DiW3gq-e%3D7jjBpQaMtToow%40mail.gmail.com.
John-Erik Persson
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/3004ac31.d201.1991f44d8d3.Webtop.1%40btinternet.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
John-Erik
Ok
------ Original Message ------
From: joer...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 6th 2025, 17:00
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 27 updates in 3 topics
Roger
I am talking about my modelJohn-Erik
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/3004ac31.d201.1991f44d8d3.Webtop.1%40btinternet.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAECQJUDs3%3Dq%3DRzjMLRXb712cstpzu4mZq9srJ7tZttH7ofvyyA%40mail.gmail.com.