Hi Ray,
> Do you have any idea what's causing the distortion of our remote
> panel in the screenshot below (our remote operator panel on the left
> side with the browser debugger on the right)? I tried debugging the
> rendering of our remote panel but can't really understand the
> rendering process of noVNC.
As I wrote in my last email, as seen below, no I don't have any idea of
what's causing this. It feels like you are troubleshooting this from
the wrong direction.
If you are having troubles with only some of your
printer-server-machines and some of them work, I'd recommend looking at
that end first. Again - what's different between the working and the
problematic machines?
Until you have more concrete information I'm afraid I can't help much.
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Samuel Mannehed <
sam...@cendio.se>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Sorry, I did not clearly explain the term "machine" in my email.
> > > It's actually a printer machine. We ran the libvncserver inside
> > > the printer to access our remote operator panel (GUI panel) on a
> > > web-based client specifically noVNC is this case. With that, I can
> > > only see this issue on a few printer machines when accessing their
> > > remote operator panel. If this is just a common bug, then I should
> > > see them on all printers we have. Did I explain this clearly?
> >
> > Ok, so the problem only happens on specific VNC server machines.
> > Your next step should be to find what's different between the
> > working and the problematic printer machines then.
> >
> > I think libvncserver has a built in websocket to TCP proxy, is that
> > the one you're using? If so, you could try to eliminate that part
> > of the equation and try a different proxy, like Websockify to see
> > if the problem persists?
> >
> > If the issue persists with Websockify we could perhaps get a
> > recording to work with as well.
> >
> > Even if noVNC incorrectly handles some data here, we need more
> > details to proceed.
> >
> > > Have you also experienced this distortion problem in noVNC before?
> >
> > No, not really.