Just adding my farthingsworth to this bit:
"I thought that if
these types of facillities were as common as a library and advertised
well, that it would help to make technology more accessible and to
create more interest in it. I was hoping that if more people are
interested in software and hardware that they would then want to study
it, gain qualifications and careers in these fields. "
There's a place, a library in fact, called Gateshead Central LIbrary. Where there were, and maybe still are, a substantial laster cutting machine, several 3D printers, cutters, presses and the like. (Epilog Helix 40W laser cutter, Prusa 3D Printers, Sawgrass Virtuoso A3 sublimation printer, Stahl Clam Heat Press, Cricut Maker Digital Cutters, Cricut Hat Press, Roland BN-20 Printer/Cutter, Mug Press, Janome Atalier 9 Sewing Machine, Janome DC360 Sewing Machines.) This collection of machines was/is operated under a scheme called - wait for it - Maker Place, at no cost to the user (well, you may have to buy the birch ply or the stencil, etc).
I've been there, tried it, and joined Makerspace instead. Why? Some people will call it bureaucratic hurdles. I call it lack of supporting resources & budgets, such as trained staff, accessible opening hours, and the operational latitude necessary to accommodate people of all sorts. As I recall, there is ONE licensed copy of desktop software suited to producing the numerical files needed to use the printers, laster etc. That copy resides on the project custodian's laptop, and must be booked in advance (two weeks, IIRC) and vetted. Not at all amenable to drop-in sessions, nor even to any sort of routine sessions.
So if someone were to provide GCL with a pile of money to help them overcome these barriers, I am pretty sure they'd leap at the chance.
To wit: private clubs like Makerspace can and do get by on a shoestring. A frayed shoestring even. A project of the same sort supported by an institution with statutory obligations becomes a matter of statutory funding. My inclination is to think that a statutory organisation like the DWP can, and maybe should, be involved in setting up longer-term, properly-resourced schemes, the way LANTRA does for ag schools. With that in mind, I vaguely recall that the Jobcentre have supported quasi-apprenticeship training schemes through 3rd-party charitable organisations. School-leavers, ex-offenders, OAPs, can get qualifications by attending loosely structured 'courses' via organisations like Men's Sheds. Maybe Makerspace could a) receive funding for such a thing, and b) get support for the administrative headache that comes with it.
There's quite a bit more to say on this sort ofundertaking, but I think I've said enough to convey the gist.
It's nice to see the initiative. I'd be glad to hear what comes of it.
David OtherP