The only thing we have to fear about that "second wave"

20 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark Crispin Miller

unread,
Jun 18, 2020, 1:37:23 AM6/18/20
to newsfromunderground
The panicky decision not to hold a regular election this November, the CDC's
dystopian "guidelines" for "reopening" elementary and high schools after
summer break (making them like high-security prisons), and the suicidal plans 
of many colleges and universities to offer mostly online courses in the fall, all 
vividly attest to the remarkable success of the Great Fear that has "us" cowering 
in anticipation of a "second wave" as lethal as the first (although the first was not 
so lethal after all)—a catastrophic "second wave" the likes of which we've never 
seen: not after the deadly flu season in 1969, not after SARS in 2003, not after the 
swine flu in 2009, nor after any other notable pandemic. 

In short, "we" seem peculiarly resigned to living under lockdown, or something 
very like it, from now on: an awesome victory for the lords of propaganda, and
a huge loss for humanity, if we don't see that "staying safe" like this will not just
make that "second wave" more likely, but—far worse—rob us all of everything
that makes our lives worth living. 

MCM  

From Keith Rushworth:
The Basic Susceptible-Infected-Resistant (SIR) model in epidemiology shows a novel infection 
first spreading rapidly through a theoretically 100% susceptible population, then slowing as the 
number of  infected-recovered, and therefore resistant, people increases. Eventually, the number 
of resistant people becomes too great for the infection to progress further. This is herd immunity 
and the end of the epidemic.  
https://epidemiologyexplained.com/epidemiology-for-dummies-what-you-ought-to-know/

If the progress of the infection is interfered with—say, by lockdown—then when that interference is 
removed, there should, theoretically, be a Second Wave. Such an event can never be as big as the 
first wave, and in any event assumes that the lockdown is/was effective. Norway apparently had 
an extremely effective lockdown, hence when they relaxed there should have been a serious 
Second Wave. There wasn't. Not even a small one. 
Norwegian Prime Minister apologised for the lockdown there. 

In essence, the cases and deaths in different countries do not correlate well with tightness of 
lockdown, which indicates that they do not work, or do not work very well, hence there is no 
sound reason to assume a Second Wave. However, Second Wave is excellent fear porn.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages