> They would demand that all US police departments train their officers
in martial arts, so they need not use guns (and tasers) as their first means
to defend themselves.
> They would demand a crackdown on the widespread abuse of anabolic
steroids, which turn cops (and troops) into rock-hard killing machines.
(On this lethal epidemic, see John Hoberman's Dopers in Uniform, published
by the University of Texas Press.) This "war on drugs" would also benefit
cops' wives and children, since steroid abuse also contributes heavily to
domestic violence.
> They would demand that the recruitment of police officers take place largely
in the neighborhoods policed, as opposed to having them commute to work
in areas whose people they don't know or like. [The Black Panther Party had
the right idea.]
> They would raise the standards for recruitment, instead of lowering them,
and pay the cops accordingly, treating them as elite public servants, not as
grunts in place to keep rich people protected and their property intact.
Why is there no discussion of American policing, and how best to improve it
—as opposed to ritually playing up the most egregious killings in our streets,
and leaving it at that? Why is there so much more press emphasis on gun
control—control of guns used not by the police, but only those used by the
citizens—than on the policies that make our cops so dangerous to all America's
have-nots? Why has no presidential candidate said anything about this grievous
problem, ever? How many mayoral candidates from coast to coast have ever said
a word about it? Any?
The subject isn't raised by "our free press" or liberal Democrats because they don't
care enough about it—that is, about us—even to discuss the issue, much less take
the necessary steps to make us safer from those officers who ought to be protecting
us, instead of blowing some of us away, to keep the rest of us in line.
MCM