This makes 4 times now this clock has failed over the past 10 years or so. This is a stock clock with IN-18's. I have another set of these electronics that has never failed, but then again, I had changed the tube board to accommodate the Z566M tube. Different current demands? It has worked like a charm for years now. The failure with the IN-8 clock this time was a leaky C6. In the past the inductor has failed, but usually its one of the electrolytics in the Pwr supply stage. It's become kind of a ritual where every 2-3 years I have to pull the clock apart and play detective and figure out what's wrong after its starts blowing fuses. Kind of fun now, actually!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/07394dde-1d45-4e3f-a38a-75ca15d16c48%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<Tube Hobby Pwr Supply Schem..jpeg>
Something else is awry there Michael. I have a friend with a TubeHobby IN18 that i built for him thatās been running for well over 6 years now with no issues. The only modification i ever made was putting an extra heatsink on the regulator as what was there (board plane) didnāt seem sufficient to me (just a hunch, Iām sure Jonas knew what he was doing..)....
Hope you get it sorted!Sent from my iPhone
This makes 4 times now this clock has failed over the past 10 years or so. This is a stock clock with IN-18's. I have another set of these electronics that has never failed, but then again, I had changed the tube board to accommodate the Z566M tube. Different current demands? It has worked like a charm for years now. The failure with the IN-8 clock this time was a leaky C6. In the past the inductor has failed, but usually its one of the electrolytics in the Pwr supply stage. It's become kind of a ritual where every 2-3 years I have to pull the clock apart and play detective and figure out what's wrong after its starts blowing fuses. Kind of fun now, actually!--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/07394dde-1d45-4e3f-a38a-75ca15d16c48%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
On Apr 6, 2019, at 9:36 PM, MichaelB <badn...@badnixie.com> wrote:I used a higher voltage capacity electrolytic this time, maybe Iāll this'll give me another year or so :-).
and I will try your idea of adding a heat sink to the VREG, since heat seems to be the culprit here. Thx Nick
This makes 4 times now this clock has failed over the past 10 years or so. This is a stock clock with IN-18's. I have another set of these electronics that has never failed, but then again, I had changed the tube board to accommodate the Z566M tube. Different current demands? It has worked like a charm for years now. The failure with the IN-8 clock this time was a leaky C6. In the past the inductor has failed, but usually its one of the electrolytics in the Pwr supply stage. It's become kind of a ritual where every 2-3 years I have to pull the clock apart and play detective and figure out what's wrong after its starts blowing fuses. Kind of fun now, actually!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/0DFF2801-AAC9-4780-9779-E01A35F1612D%40gmail.com.
R6 has about 180V across it - is it rated for that? There may be RF oscillation on the HV output - have you scoped the HV and LV on the failing unit?
Nick
I have one of these clocks too and it fails every three years or so on average. Itās all down to C6. Sometimes just F1 fails and other times the inductor L1 goes short circuit as well.The Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR) of C6 goes through the roof, causing it to effectively be a capacitor in series with a resistance. This result is ringing in L1, and instability in the output voltage which increases L1ās heat dissipation and untimely failure. Ambient temperature is definitely a factor in C6ās lifespan, i.e clocks running in cooler climates may run longer before failing, but the real mechanism of failure is C6ās ability to withstand the internal heat generated by the pulse current as its ESR rises with age. The higher itās ESR, the warmer it runs, then the quicker its electrolyte dries up.High quality, low ESR 105 degree electrolytic capacitors designed for pulse applications like the Panasonic WL-R series will have a longer life than āordinaryā electros but eventually even they will fail. I have thought about substituting a Multilayer Ceramic Capacitor in place of electrolytic C6, but currently waiting for the next failure (which is about due!) before I experiment with them. Perhaps another person can comment on their suitability for such an application?Regards from Australia!Ā
On Apr 6, 2019, at 9:36 PM, MichaelB <badn...@badnixie.com> wrote:I used a higher voltage capacity electrolytic this time, maybe Iāll this'll give me another year or so :-).Are you using 85°C or 105°C?and I will try your idea of adding a heat sink to the VREG, since heat seems to be the culprit here. Thx NickNever turn your back on a 78xx. You could try using a 317 instead (requires a resistor).Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
"The Mac Doctor"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
Michael, I have to comment on the logic here.
You say you have one that is quite OK and seem to use that fact to rule out the effects mentioned by Nick. Actually, I consider that the parasitic oscillations idea is reinforced by your fact, not denied by it.Ā Ā When a circuit is on the verge of misbehaving there will be some that are OK and some that arenāt.
Obviously I canāt tell from here what the actual fault is.
Capacitors.Ā I am interested in the topic. Low ESR electrolytics are a curse. [Remember that fuss about the āstolenā formula not being complete and all the computer manufacturers being affected?] Some do seem to last better than expected. Some fail quickly. The LED lighting industry is possibly going to cause improvements. Those tiny electros that they hide in the base of the globe really are stressed. And some sellers still quote the expected LED life as that for the power supply too ! Ā Ā Ā Ā Oops.Ā [And Australian consumer law provides for lifetime warranty btw, regardless of what the manufacturer states. And we beat up Steam to the point that they allow returns!]
I am very interested in hearing about how well different brands and types of capacitor perform. Anyone tried non-electros?
I have noticed that some switching supplies driving discharge tubes for TV and laptop backlighting [yeah, old ones, not LED ones] use monolithic solid caps. One I fixed had only 2uF though iirc.Ā A pity that opamp capacitor multipliers donāt store energy J .
Ā
John K
Australia
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/22340da1-4f58-4673-bb1d-a9bdebb8fd14%40googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/c55b7b6b-a7d7-4f50-8eb8-10bb79c6a208%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9e8b78a6-afd5-4b0e-8f46-59340b36f948%40googlegroups.com.