If you are still slow with the 10pF, a 12pF is not going to do it. The relationship between the crystal and load capacitor is critical, and it is therefore a mystery to me that so many (of the cheaper) are sold without the specifications. Anyway, if yours is a cheap Chinese crystal, try some other ones, perhaps you just got a bad one. Generally I always like to get a good brand name crystal. If you want to play with the one you have, try something lower yet, 8 or 7pF.
In general terms, and within limits, larger cap slows it down, smaller cap speeds it up. Sometimes (if you use 2 caps) using a slightly different cap on one leg of the crystal can make a difference in the final frequency.
Bill
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7ce2b557-f652-44b2-a71f-ed75b96ea06fn%40googlegroups.com.
David, I need to consult you about the rubidium oscillator. I am wanting to set one up. Can you offer any hints or tips
on dividing down the osc. Freq. (10 mHz, I think it is, and typically powered by 24 volts DC). Any of your thoughts
will be helpful. Thanks, Chuck
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPbqtvfXMhwT4BZLp64Rn_1SpMxDa-46RBVcpLMgkb0-4fFxMw%40mail.gmail.com.
Without knowing your exact design I cannot recommend a specific xtal. For instance, PIC processors recommend a xtal with a load capacity of about 12pF, while other designs are optimized for different xtals. Often the devise data sheet will give you a short list of recommended xtals which have been tested by the chip designer. The main thing is that for critical applications (such as a time keeping devise) always get a good brand name item with full specifications. Often xtals used for running a program are not critical, so there you can sometimes get away with something cheap; as long as it runs, and is close. I am a great proponent of recycling, but saving 32kHz clock xtals is not worth the trouble. Xtals are complicated; there are different cuts and styles, all specific to particular applications.
There is a great app note from Microchip worth reading:
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/appnotes/00949a.pdf
Even Wikipedia has a decent chapter on xtals:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_oscillator
Lots of other good information sources on the interweb.
Cheers, Bill
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/5e51943e-d45c-4421-b00c-06fb2dc8380fn%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/TiYbTyH9ISc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/013901d7360c%2491079660%24b316c320%24%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPbqtvfXMhwT4BZLp64Rn_1SpMxDa-46RBVcpLMgkb0-4fFxMw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/TiYbTyH9ISc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/8c45e8b5-dd09-496c-b1fe-8116fd4dd4cdn%40googlegroups.com.
As long as you are still trying things, you should try different crystals. Instead of New Old Stock from a surplus electronics dealer (probably from the 1970s wen quality control was not very good), you could take one out of a clock or watch mechanism that does a good job keeping time (the ones I have gotten in the 21st century have been very accurate, within a few seconds per month).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/TiYbTyH9ISc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/0c176072-f537-47bb-8095-d55729421484n%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/TiYbTyH9ISc/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ed8a7356-74f9-4ed3-8fad-854a0779f4bbn%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b9d34649-4fef-4fe8-a44b-8544b51dee8cn%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b0456e09-3348-44d4-a2d5-5ec466983b82n%40googlegroups.com.