--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/42E92C91-6240-4200-BBA2-3B2EE2B29F83%40gmail.com.
On Jun 6, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Nicholas Stock <nick...@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAOX%2BRHJoQD%2B2nE%2B7Dsrr1xh4KWEGE-0GjtF4zAMac_%3DfR0jA-w%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9DB89D01-91D3-434B-AEDA-AF178B536BDE%40gmail.com.
I’ve also experienced a higher failure rate on the IN16 tubes. Definitely a leakage issue on all of the failures. I haven’t seen the bright pink phenomena but partial digits from the bottom up is what I have experienced.
I have a PV clock that uses them and after multiple replacements of tubes, the PCB is in tough shape to the point, I may not be able to make any more successful replacements if another goes out. Unfortunately, PV does not offer the kit anymore. My notes are that it has had 7 new tubes since it was put into operation in May 2016.
In the future, if I ever built another IN-16 clock, I would not use the spacer/lead separator that comes with the tube. They make tube replacement very difficult. I prefer to chop the leads from the tube and then de-solder one at a time, which can’t really be done with the spacers in place. On my particular clock, there is also a baselight LED to remove and the PCB did not play well with the heat gun for doing a removal all at once.
Jeff
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAOX%2BRHLzupB75mJFydQXTZ2onE3H0Nmt8XLN4js5nOdVnappnQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/00d001dbd71f%2401618d50%240424a7f0%24%40gmail.com.