On Nov 3, 2025, at 10:11 PM, Afis Deinde <odide...@yahoo.com> wrote:
“ What evidence did they proffer in their case in chief to prove "Kanu is charged on several counts of terrorism including incitements and killings coming from those incitements"?You this stupid piece of shit, what are you ranting about?I don’t come here as I used to because I don’t see any value to add.I had be on vacation for life than come here daily to debate with Nebu the ten times Bar failure.The evidence in court and witnesses have already testified for the prosecutors that Nnamdi Kanu was their boss, and tapes were played showing he was inciting his followers to kill Yoruba and Hausa.Kanu did not render any defense.Now comes Oloobuuku bedwetter Nebu, telling us Kanu’s non-defense was a great one.You this loser should move on and away from this forum.A disgrace to his people!AfisSent from my iPhoneWho’s promising you all things, heaven on earth?Lemme guess, a naked man with his hands in his pockets!On Nov 3, 2025, at 1:02 PM, 'Nebukadineze Adiele' via ||NaijaObserver|| <naijao...@googlegroups.com> wrote:>>Them say Kanu is the leader of a Terrorist group, that’s all the judge needs to rule on.Kanu is charged on several counts of terrorism including incitements and killings coming from those incitements. Those charges are inside whatever books of law that the country operates on, from the colonial times to now. Unless those laws had been declared unconstitutional by some courts, these laws and even judges verdicts from international communities can be used in any judgement in Nigeria<< (Afis Afọnshi Odidere).Filthily fat toady Afis Afọnshi Odidere aka Omotunwashi, aka Idera, aka Niyi, aka Deinde, aka, aka, and aka:Once in a while you sneak into my email from one of your multiple email addresses, especially those that I hadn't blocked, then you emit arrant stupidity, unembarrassed exhibition of semi-literacy, and abject disgusting juvenility. I hadn't read anything from you in over three weeks, yet now that I am reading one, I am reading the same idiocy for which I blocked you.Your problem is illiteracy, Afis Afọnshi Odidere, else you would have known that the points you made here were Kanu's grounds for asserting that his trial is invalid. Are they correct in saying that Kanu "is the leader of a Terrorist group"? What evidence did they proffer in their case in chief to prove "Kanu is charged on several counts of terrorism including incitements and killings coming from those incitements"? What are the counts of "terrorism", a vague concept not sustainable by any statute? How did they link Kanu to any act of terroristic act by way of incitement? Are you unaware that the prosecutors were so incompetent and stupid that they had to withdraw their original charges, because they stated that he made the incitement in London, which means they have no jurisdiction over the case? By refiling the charges without indicating the place of occurrence, they violated section 172 of the same terrorism prevention laws upon which they claim to be prosecuting him, yet they failed in their case in chief to link Kanu to any specific killings?(1) Not only are the charges preferred against Kanu not valid in law, the prosecution also woefully failed to establish any case against him in its case in chief (in a lawful society, the judge would have dismissed the case when Kanu submitted a no case request -- I concede that judges rarely grant such requests even when it is obvious that the prosecution established no case). (2) If you, Afis Afọnshi Odidere, shoplifted in Atlanta, the state of Florida has no jurisdiction to kidnap you from Texas and put you on trial in Orlando for having shoplifted in Atlanta. The equivalent of this scenario is the kidnapping of Kanu from Kenya to Nigeria and purportedly trying him for crimes he allegedly committed while in London. This is not just stupid, it is also a violation of international law. (3) As per Nigeria's signatory to extradition laws, Nigeria is in violation of international law by kidnapping Kanu from Kenya; by that same law, Nigeria cannot put Kanu on trial, having obtained him via extraordinary rendition -- the Court of Appeal was correct but the Supreme Court, led by the corrupt and incompetent hag who made Hope Uzọdimma governor of Imo state, was shamefully wrong in reversing the Court of Appeal. (4) A court in Kenya has ruled that Kanu was actually kidnapped from its territory, so were Kenyan authorities not incompetent, corrupt, and in collusion with terroristic Nigeria, Kenya would have been at war (legally) with Nigeria for defiling its territory with that kidnapping.Nnamdi Kanu is not stupid, his major problem is garrulity and impolitic diction. Based on the above facts I listed in the above paragraph, Kanu recognized that Nigeria has no case against him, failed to make one against him after its case in chief, and is only bent on using a corrupt and incompetent judiciary to putting him away. By not putting on a defense, which he doesn't have to put up even if there was a valid case against him -- the prosecution has the onus of proving him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt -- he is refusing to legitimize the illegality being perpetrated by Nigerian government. Kanu is aware now that the judge's asking him to put up a defense is a formality, that even if Jesus Christ were his defense attorney, this kangaroo court would still find him guilty of invalid charges. This is a brilliant move; his firing his lawyers was also smart because their incompetence is beyond toleration -- the idiots didn't even find out that the Nigerian Medical Council submitted a forged fit certification of Kanu's health (dated three days before the judge had even ordered for the certification) until Kanu discovered it himself. Kanu queried them about it and asked them to bring it to the judge's attention for a reversal of his ruling on Kanu's so-called fitness for trial. The judged acknowledged the forgery but refused to reverse his ruling on NMC's certification because it is too late. This is a kangaroo court, no sound judge would not correct this, since it is a reversible of conviction ground upon appeal.Afis Afọnshi Odidere, I have not responded to you because you posses any intelligence to comprehend what I have written here or because you hold any character to recognizing and upholding the truth, I responded for the sake of posterity. Those who read our writings, say a hundred years from now, will see that you did not get away with stupidity, semi-literacy, and fondness for injustice. Stop responding to anything I post, you and I are not in the same category -- Nebu is the equivalent of a world class mathematician, while you are a nitwit who can't even solve a mere quadratic equation.Nebukadineze Adiele--On Sunday, November 2, 2025 at 02:26:27 AM EST, Afis Deinde <odide...@yahoo.com> wrote:Nebu is the illiterate he calls other people.Them say Kanu is the leader of a Terrorist group, that’s all the judge needs to rule on.Kanu is charged on several counts of terrorism including incitements and killings coming from those incitements.Those charges are inside whatever books of law that the country operates on, from the colonial times to now.Unless those laws had been declared unconstitutional by some courts, these laws and even judges verdicts from international communities can be used in any judgement in Nigeria.I’m warning you all do not ever employ Nebu for any legal work.This guy is not a real lawyer.😂😂😂AfisSent from my iPhoneWho’s promising you all things, heaven on earth?Lemme guess, a naked man with his hands in his pockets!On Nov 1, 2025, at 11:13 PM, 'Nebukadineze Adiele' via ||NaijaObserver|| <naijao...@googlegroups.com> wrote:>>IPOB challenges the Nigerian Government to show the public:
The valid and extant law under which Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is being tried.
The subsisting legal charge that qualifies as an offence in Nigeria today.<<These are valid questions that, if not answered truthfully, continue to impeach the validity of this trial. Barely educated idiots on these forums simplistically assert that Nnamdi Kanu doesn't want to put a defense, but thy lack the commonsense to knowing that, if Nigeria's case against Kanu is invalid, then he needs not put up a defense to validate their case. Nigeria has the burden of proving Kanu guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Kanu mustn't put up any defense, even if the charges against him were valid.Tufiakwa to semi-literacy!Nebukadineze Adiele--On Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 09:39:31 AM EDT, Abraham Madu <abraha...@yahoo.com> wrote:PRESS STATEMENT
28 OCTOBER 2025
FG And UK’s AI Propaganda Confirms They Have Completely Lost The Battle Against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu
The attention of the noble family of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) under the supreme leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has been drawn to yet another laughable piece of artificial intelligence garbage being circulated by agents of the Nigerian Government, their collaborators in the United Kingdom, and the familiar chorus of anti-Igbo media outlets, claiming that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu threatened to “wipe out Obasanjo’s lineage.” Only a regime drowning in shame would churn out such childish forgeries to deceive a semi-literate audience.
This fresh hoax follows closely on the heels of last week’s fabricated video where the same criminals made it appear as if Mazi Kanu declared himself a god who decides who lives or dies. When propaganda becomes this desperate, it can only mean one thing. The enemies of Biafra have lost the argument. They have lost the case. They have lost the moral ground. The only weapon left to them is insult to public intelligence.
For the record, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has always shown respect to elder statesmen such as Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, Alhaji Shehu Shagari, President Umaru Musa Yar’adua, and Professor Yemi Osinbajo. There has never been a single instance where he disrespected them. The attempt to tie him to an imaginary threat is a disgraceful propaganda stunt that collapses under the slightest scrutiny.
The timing of this AI fabrication is very telling. It appears the Nigerian Government and their British handlers are jittery that a respected figure like President Obasanjo may soon call for the immediate release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Their solution is to rush out a poorly-edited video to poison the air before the truth overwhelms their narrative.
IPOB challenges the Nigerian Government to show the public:
The valid and extant law under which Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is being tried.
The subsisting legal charge that qualifies as an offence in Nigeria today.
If they can produce those two things, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will enter his defence immediately. Instead of answering this basic constitutional demand, they are investing in AI deepfakes and media manipulation.
This nonsense is also proof that Justice James Omotosho at the Federal High Court Abuja may finally be telling those behind this persecution that he cannot continue to aid their judicial rascality. If they could rely on the law, they would not be manufacturing cartoons.
IPOB reminds the world that the insecurity in the South East began after the extraordinary rendition and unlawful detention of our leader. A man held in solitary confinement for years cannot be the source of external violence. Nigerian security agencies created the chaos and now blame the victim to cover their tracks. It is a criminal logic that fools nobody.
Those spreading these forgeries must understand that IPOB cannot be swayed by propaganda, AI distortion, or media intimidation. The issues remain unchanged:
• Release Mazi Nnamdi Kanu unconditionally
• End the persecution of IPOB
• Respect the right to self-determination
• Allow a peaceful referendum for the Biafran people
If certain individuals prefer to remain second-class citizens in Nigeria, that is their right. They have only one vote in any referendum. Let them not drag others into servitude with them.
Nigeria should stop disgracing itself with forged videos and answer the simple question before the court. Where is the law.
COMRADE EMMA POWERFUL SPOKESPERSON/MEDIA AND PUBLICITY SECRETARY FOR IPOB.
Ntị ọdị kwa?
Ya kpọtụba!
Ya gazie.
Ụmụ nne Abrahamụọgụ Aṅụsịobi Madụ.
To join this group, send email to naijao...@googlegroups.com
View this message at https://groups.google.com/a/googlegroups.com/d/msg/naijaobserver/topic-id/message-id
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "||NaijaObserver||" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to naijaobserve...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/naijaobserver/118486046.1866493.1762035202639%40mail.yahoo.com.
To join this group, send email to naijao...@googlegroups.com
View this message at https://groups.google.com/a/googlegroups.com/d/msg/naijaobserver/topic-id/message-id
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "||NaijaObserver||" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to naijaobserve...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/naijaobserver/1521519004.2059607.1762171282401%40mail.yahoo.com.
>>Any yr 1, law student knows that Nnamdi Kanu is heading to prison<< (Afis Afọnshi Odidere)
Consequently, trial Justice James Omotosho adjourned the case till November 7 for the defendant to open his defence as he was previously ordered to do by the court.
The trial judge warned that he would foreclose Kanu’s right should he fail to enter his defence on the next adjourned date.
“If he does not, I will deem him closed. I know that he is an Economist and not a lawyer.
“I will give the last opportunity to the defendant to put in his defence, failure of which he would be deemed closed,” Justice Omotosho held.
The development came after Kanu, who is conducting his case by himself after he disengaged his legal team, reaffirmed his position that he had no case to answer.
The embattled IPOB leader had after the case was called up, addressed the court from the dock.
He reiterated the reasons he elected not to open his defence, insisting that the charge pending against him was invalid as it was based on what he described as a “repealed and non-existent law.”
Kanu maintained that the Supreme Court had on the day it okayed his trial, directed that the charge against him should be amended.
He said the apex court based its decision on the fact that the charge was legally defective.
According to the defendant, in disobedience to Supreme Court’s directive, FG docked him on the same charge without effecting the necessary amendments.
He insisted that the FG’s refusal to amend the charge was fatal to his trial which he said could not be predicated on a repealed law.
“Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act has been repealed. I cannot put in defense under a repealed law. I won’t do that,” Kanu added.
On his part, FG’s lawyer, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, urged the court to go ahead and foreclose Kanu’s defence.
The prosecution counsel drew the attention of the court to the fact that the defendant had wasted five out of the six days that was slated for his defence.
He argued that Kanu’s insistence that the charge was defective reflected his conclusive stance not to open his defence as directed.
Therefore, FG’s lawyer prayed the court to close the defence and order parties to file their final written addresses, a precursor to the delivery of judgement in the matter.
However, following Justice Omotosho’s intervention, having declared the court’s willingness to grant one more adjournment, Kanu, asked to be allowed to consult four lawyers that hitherto represented him in the case.
He gave names of the lawyers he described as his consultants, as; Nnaemeka Ejiofor, Aloy Ejimakor, Maxwell Okpara and Mandela Umegborogu.
Justice Omotosho, who acceded to the request, however cautioned the lawyers to refrain from discussing the court proceedings in the media.
The caution followed a complaint by the prosecution counsel, Awomolo, SAN, who accused Kanu’s former lawyers of granting media interviews and making.
It will be recalled that the court had on October 24, ordered the IPOB leader to open his defence to the charge against him.
However, Kanu, who earlier named several individuals that included serving Governors, Ministers, ex-Governors and Security Chiefs, among the 23 persons he intended to produce as his witnesses, later made a volte farce and shelved his plan to defend the charge.
Kanu, who has been in detention since 2021, had initially prayed the court to grant him a 90-day period for the witnesses he described as vital, to testify in the matter.
Among his earlier proposed witnesses included the Governor of Imo state, Hope Uzodimma; that of Lagos state, Babajide Sanwo-Olu; Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike; the immediate past Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami; as well as a former Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Tukur Buratai (rtd).
Others were the Minister of Works, Dave Umahi; the immediate past Governor of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu; a former Minister of Defence, Gen. Theophilus Danjuma (rtd); immediate past former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, NIA, Ahmed Rufai Abubakar; as well as the former Director-General of the Department of State Services, DSS, Yusuf Bichi.
On Nov 5, 2025, at 9:56 AM, 'Nebukadineze Adiele' via ||NaijaObserver|| <naijao...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/naijaobserver/597314473.2570495.1762333003398%40mail.yahoo.com.
Governor Charles Chukwuma Soludo of Anambra State has rejected claims suggesting that Christians in Nigeria’s South-East are victims of a religious genocide, describing such assertions as false and misleading.
Soludo, who spoke during a live media chat on Channels Television, said the violence in the region is rooted in social, political and economic grievances, not religious persecution.
The governor’s remarks come in response to recent statements by U.S. President Donald Trump, who accused the Nigerian government of allowing widespread killings of Christians and threatened possible military action to “protect” them.
Soludo, however, argued that the situation in the South-East is far more complex than the U.S. narrative suggests.
“There is a deeper conversation and introspection about what goes on in the country,” Soludo said.
“In this part of the world, eastern Nigeria, it is not religious. People are killing themselves, Christians killing Christians. The people in the bushes are Emmanuel, Peter, and John, all Christian names, and they have maimed and killed thousands of our youths. It has nothing to do with religion.”
The former Central Bank governor explained that the region is almost entirely Christian, noting that the perpetrators and victims of the ongoing violence share the same faith.
“In this part of the country, we are 95 percent Christians, and the people in the bushes killing people bear Christian names,” he added. “It is wider than the categorisation of Christians and Muslims. Nigeria will overcome, and it will end in conversation.”
“While the United States is entitled to its opinions, its actions must still align with international law,” he said.